The sustainable development analyzing of Heilongjiang province by ecological footprint

被引：0

作者：

Qiu, W. ^{[1
]}

Zhao, Q. L. ^{[1
]}

Chang, C. C. ^{[1
]}

Zhao, Z. W. ^{[1
]}

Li, S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Harbin Inst Technol, State Key Lab Urban Water Resources & Environm, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China

来源：

2008 PROCEEDINGS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM SCIENCES: ITESS 2008, VOL 4 | 2008年

关键词：

ecological footprint; ecological capacity; ecological deficit/surplus; Heilongjiang province;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Realizing sustainability is the problem needs to be solved urgently. It is essential to select an appropriate method to assess sustainable development. This paper takes Heilongjiang province as the research object to analyze sustainable development by ecological footprint from 1995 to 2005. The arable land contributed most to the ecological footprint among the six components of the ecological footprint per capita of Heilongjiang Province. It is consistent with the actual situation. The total ecological footprint has risen from 8.19x10(7) gha in 1995 to 9.44x10(7) gha in 1997, and then declined little to 8.79 x 10(7) gha in 1998, whereafter increases to 1.24x10(8) gha in 2005. The total ecological capacity tends to increase from 8.66x10(7) gha in 1995 to 9.25x10(7) gha in 2005. Although the ecological capacity increased a little, it is slower then the ecological footprint rising. The results show that Heilongjiang province is suffered unsustainable during the year 1996, 1997, 2004 and 2005. The main reason is exploiting and consuming natural resource in excess and the improper economy increasing manner.

引用

页码：578 / 582

页数：5

共 22 条

[1]

[Anonymous], HEILONGJIANG STAT YB

[2]

Barrett J, 2001, Corporate Environmental Strategy, V8, P316, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1066-7938(01)00132-4

[3] Analysis of livelihood security: A case study in the Kali-Khola watershed of Nepal [J].

Bhandari, B. S. ;

Grant, M. .

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 85 (01) :17-26

[4] Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation [J].

Brown, MT ;

Ulgiati, S .

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 9 (1-2) :51-69

[5]

CHAMBERS N, 2002, RESOURCE FLOW ECOLOG, P1

[6]

*FAO, 1994, FAO YB, P48

[7] How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 [J].

Haberl, H ;

Erb, KH ;

Krausmann, F .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 38 (01) :25-45

[8]

Ji XiBin, 2006, Agricultural Sciences in China, V5, P130, DOI 10.1016/S1671-2927(06)60030-8

[9] 'Ecological value added' in an integrated ecosystem-economy model - an indicator for sustainability [J].

Kratena, K .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (02) :189-200

[10] Ecological footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions [J].

McDonald, GW ;

Patterson, MG .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 50 (1-2) :49-67

← 1 2 3 →