Intermediate clinical endpoints: A bridge between progression-free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer trials

被引:62
|
作者
Matulonis, Ursula A. [1 ]
Oza, Amit M. [2 ]
Ho, Tony W. [3 ]
Ledermann, Jonathan A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] UCL, UCL Canc Inst, London, England
关键词
clinical trial; ovarian cancer; progression-free survival; surrogate endpoints; survival; PHASE-III TRIAL; OLAPARIB MAINTENANCE THERAPY; INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA; CELL LUNG-CANCER; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; COLORECTAL-CANCER; 1ST-LINE THERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; EXPERT PANEL; COLON-CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.29082
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ovarian cancer patients are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, experience recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy, and eventually develop resistance to chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS), which has improved in recent years as more active treatments have been incorporated into patient care, is regarded as the most clinically relevant endpoint in ovarian cancer trials. However, although there remains a significant need for new treatments that prolong OS further without compromising quality of life, it has become increasingly difficult to detect an OS benefit for investigational treatments because of the use of multiple lines of chemotherapy to treat ovarian cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS), which measures the time to disease progression or death, is unaffected by postprogression therapies but does not evaluate the long-term impact of investigational treatments on tumor biology and responses to future therapies. Recent clinical trials of targeted agents in relapsed ovarian cancer have shown improvements in PFS but not OS, and this is possibly reflective of the long postprogression survival (PPS) period associated with this disease. Intermediate endpoints such as the time to second disease progression or death and the time to second subsequent therapy or death may provide supportive evidence for clinically meaningful PFS improvements and may be used to determine whether these improvements persist beyond the first disease progression and throughout subsequent lines of therapy. For clinical trials that have settings with a long PPS duration and/or involve multiple rounds of postprogression therapy, a primary endpoint of PFS supported by intermediate clinical endpoints and OS may provide a more comprehensive approach for evaluating efficacy. Cancer 2015;121:1737-1746. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. Overall survival is regarded as the most clinically relevant endpoint in trials of ovarian cancer, but it may be confounded by multiple lines of subsequent therapy. A primary endpoint of progression-free survival supported by intermediate clinical endpoints and overall survival provides a more comprehensive approach for evaluating efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1746
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Poor correlation between progression-free and overall survival in modern clinical trials: Are composite endpoints the answer?
    Amir, Eitan
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Kwong, Ryan
    Tannock, Ian F.
    Ocana, Alberto
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (03) : 385 - 388
  • [2] OVERALL SURVIVAL VERSUS PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL IN ONCOLOGY CLINICAL TRIALS
    Aissaoui, A.
    Bin Sawad, A.
    Turkistani, F.
    Aissaoui, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A717 - A717
  • [3] Evaluation of Overall Response Rate and Progression-Free Survival as Potential Surrogate Endpoints for Overall Survival in Immunotherapy Trials
    Mushti, Sirisha L.
    Mulkey, Flora
    Sridhara, Rajeshwari
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (10) : 2268 - 2275
  • [4] DIFFERENCES IN CORRELATION OF PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND OVERALL SURVIVAL BY CLINICAL VARIABLES IN EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
    Paik, E. S.
    Jeong, S. Y.
    Kim, M. S.
    Kim, J. H.
    Kim, T. J.
    Lee, J. W.
    Kim, B. G.
    Bae, D. S.
    Choi, C. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 717 - 717
  • [5] DIFFERENCES IN CORRELATION OF PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND OVERALL SURVIVAL BY CLINICAL VARIABLES IN EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
    Paik, E. S.
    Kang, M.
    Lee, J. H.
    Kang, J. H.
    Jeong, S. Y.
    Kim, M. S.
    Lee, Y-Y
    Kim, T-J
    Lee, J-W
    Kim, B-G
    Bae, D-S
    Seo, J.
    Choi, C. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A504 - A505
  • [6] The Waning Relationship Between Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Randomized Cancer Therapy Trials
    Markman, Maurie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 (06) : 30 - 32
  • [7] Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in modern ovarian cancer trials: a meta-analysis
    Sjoquist, Katrin M.
    Lord, Sarah J.
    Friedlander, Michael L.
    Simes, Robert John
    Marschner, Ian C.
    Lee, Chee Khoon
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 10 : 1 - 16
  • [8] CORRELATION BETWEEN PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN CANCER AFTER DEBULKING SURGERY
    Chase, D.
    Mahajan, A.
    Scott, D. A.
    Hawkins, N.
    Woodward, T.
    Kalilani, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A286 - A286
  • [9] Rethinking Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as a Clinical Trials Surrogate for Overall Survival (OS)
    Stewart, D.
    Bosse, D.
    Ocana, A.
    Goss, G.
    Jonker, D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S1782 - S1782
  • [10] THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND OVERALL SURVIVAL IN ONCOLOGY TRIALS: A SIMULATION EXERCISE
    Wu, D. B. C.
    Manjula, I. S.
    Yu, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S198 - S198