Influence of kinetics on DDT simulations

被引:47
作者
Dounia, O. [1 ]
Vermorel, O. [1 ]
Misdariis, A. [1 ]
Poinsot, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] CERFACS, Toulouse, France
[2] IMFT, Toulouse, France
关键词
DDT; Detailed chemistry; Flame acceleration; Detonation onset; DNS; TO-DETONATION TRANSITION; FLAME ACCELERATION; DIRECT INITIATION; BLOCKAGE RATIO; DEFLAGRATION; CHANNELS; TEMPERATURE; MIXTURES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.11.009
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Deflagration to Detonation Transition (DDT) is an intricate problem that has been tackled numerically, until recently, using single-step chemical schemes. These studies (summarized in Oran and Gamezo, 2007) [1] showed that DDT is triggered when a gradient of reactivity forms inside a pocket of unreacted material. However, recent numerical simulations of hydrogen/air explosions using detailed reaction mechanisms (Liberman et al., 2010; Ivanov et al., 2011) [2,3] showed that detonation waves can emerge from the flame brush, unlike what was usually seen in the single-step simulations. The present work focuses on chemistry modeling and its impact on DDT. Using the idealized Hot Spot (HS) problem with constant temperature gradient, this study shows that, in the case of hydrogen/air mixtures, the multi-step chemical description is far more restrictive than the single-step model when it comes to the necessary conditions for a hot spot to lead to detonation. A gas explosion scenario in a confined and obstructed channel filled with an hydrogen/air mixture is then considered. In accordance with the HS analysis, the Zeldovich's (1970) mechanism [4] is responsible for the detonation initiation in the single-step case, whereas another process, directly involving the deflagration front, initiated DDT in the complex chemistry case. In the latter, a shock focusing event leads to DDT in the flame brush through Pressure Pulse (PP) amplification. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Adams G.K., 1958, Symposium (International) on Combustion, V7, P812, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0082-0784(58)80125-3
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   Deflagrative, auto-ignitive, and detonative propagation regimes in engines [J].
Bates, L. ;
Bradley, D. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2017, 175 :118-122
[4]   Engine hot spots: Modes of auto-ignition and reaction propagation [J].
Bates, Luke ;
Bradley, Derek ;
Paczko, Guenter ;
Peters, Norbert .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2016, 166 :80-85
[5]  
Berman M., 1984, SAND840689 SAND NAT
[6]   Flame propagation across an obstacle: OH-PLIF and 2-D simulations with detailed chemistry [J].
Boeck, L. R. ;
Lapointe, S. ;
Melguizo-Gavilanes, J. ;
Ciccarelli, G. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2017, 36 (02) :2799-2806
[7]   An explicit reduced mechanism for H2-air combustion [J].
Boivin, P. ;
Jimenez, C. ;
Sanchez, A. L. ;
Williams, F. A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2011, 33 :517-523
[8]   Influence of autoignition delay time characteristics of different fuels on pressure waves and knock in reciprocating engines [J].
Bradley, D. ;
Kalghatgi, G. T. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2009, 156 (12) :2307-2318
[9]   Flame acceleration and transition to detonation in ducts [J].
Ciccarelli, G. ;
Dorofeev, S. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (04) :499-550
[10]  
Clavin P, 2016, COMBUSTION WAVES FRO