Scientific challenges, opportunities and priorities for the US fusion energy sciences program

被引:4
作者
Baker, C [1 ]
Prager, S
Abdou, M
Berry, L
Betti, R
Chan, V
Craig, D
Dahlburg, J
Davidson, R
Drake, J
Hawryluk, R
Hill, D
Hubbard, A
Logan, G
Marmar, E
Mauel, M
McCarthy, K
Parker, S
Sauthoff, N
Stambaugh, R
Ulrickson, M
Van Dam, J
Wurden, G
Zarnstorff, M
Zinkle, S
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[5] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[6] Gen Atom Co, San Diego, CA 92138 USA
[7] USN, Res Lab, Washington, DC 20375 USA
[8] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[9] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[10] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA USA
[11] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[12] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[13] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[14] Idaho Natl Engn Environm Lab, Idaho Falls, ID USA
[15] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[16] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[17] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
fusion science; fusion energy; fusion priorities;
D O I
10.1007/s10894-005-6922-z
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In October 2003, Dr. Raymond Orbach, Director of the Department of Energy's Office of Science, issued a charge to the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) "to identify the major science and technology issues that need to be addressed, recommend how to organize campaigns to address these issues, and recommend the priority order for these campaigns." The sections in this report document the results of the Panel's work. The first two sections describe the concepts of the overarching themes, topical scientific questions, and campaigns. The next six sections (Sections 3-8) describe in detail the six scientific campaigns. Section 9 describes some important enabling research activities necessary for the campaigns. Sections 10-12 describe the overarching themes, which provide a crosscutting perspective of the activities in the six campaigns. Finally, the Panel's recommendations are set forth in Section 13. The charge letter to the panel is provided as Appendix A; the FESAC response letter is provided as Appendix D.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 114
页数:102
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Connecting Quarks with the Cosmos
[2]  
*FESAC PAN IN FUS, 2004, REV IN FUS EN
[3]  
*FESAC SUBC INT SI, 2002, DOESC0073 FESAC SUBC
[4]   MAGNETIC-FIELD PITCH-ANGLE MEASUREMENTS IN THE PBX-M TOKAMAK USING THE MOTIONAL STARK-EFFECT [J].
LEVINTON, FM ;
FONCK, RJ ;
GAMMEL, GM ;
KAITA, R ;
KUGEL, HW ;
POWELL, ET ;
ROBERTS, DW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1989, 63 (19) :2060-2063
[5]   Experimental characterization of coherent, radially-sheared zonal flows in the DIII-D tokamak [J].
McKee, GR ;
Fonck, RJ ;
Jakubowski, M ;
Burrell, KH ;
Hallatschek, K ;
Moyer, RA ;
Rudakov, DL ;
Nevins, W ;
Porter, GD ;
Schoch, P ;
Xu, X .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2003, 10 (05) :1712-1719
[6]  
National Task Force on High Energy Density Physics, 2004, FRONT DISC HIGH EN D
[7]   CURRENT DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENT IN A TOKAMAK BY FIR POLARIMETRY [J].
SOLTWISCH, H .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1986, 57 (08) :1939-1944
[8]  
*US TRANSP TASK FO, 2003, NEW IN TRANSP STUD
[9]  
2003, FRONTIERS HIGH ENERG
[10]  
2004, BURNING PLASMA BRING