Democratic and expert legitimacy: Science, politics and the public during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:25
作者
Weingart, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Schalkwyk, Francois [4 ]
Guenther, Lars [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Ctr Res Evaluat Sci & Technol, Private Bag X1 Matieland, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
[2] Bielefeld Univ, Dept Sociol, POB 100131, D-33501 Bielefeld, Nordrhein Westf, Germany
[3] Bielefeld Univ, Inst Interdisciplinary Studies Sci, POB 100131, D-33501 Bielefeld, Nordrhein Westf, Germany
[4] Stellenbosch Univ, DST NRF Ctr Excellence Scientometr & STI Policy, Ctr Res Evaluat Sci & Technol, Private Bag X1 Matieland, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
[5] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Econ & Social Sci, Journalism & Commun Studies, Grindelberg 7, D-20144 Hamburg, Germany
[6] Stellenbosch Univ, Ctr Res Evaluat Sci & Technol, NRF Res Chair Sci Commun, Private Bag X1 Matieland, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
democracy; science; COVID-19; expertise; trust; TRUST; TRANSPARENCY; GOVERNMENT;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scac003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has provided an extraordinary test case for an analysis of the interrelations between policymakers and scientific experts faced with grave decisions and given the respective levels of trust they enjoy. The article provides a comparative analysis between three countries-Germany, the USA and South Africa (SA)-of the interrelation between the public's perceptions of the threat posed by the pandemic, the trust in governments and in scientific experts formally organized to advise governments, and the acceptance of governments' decisions to mitigate the pandemic. These scientific experts enjoyed a high degree of acceptance even when admitting uncertainty and the need for further research. Support for politicians also remained high in spite of the severity of the measures implemented and their increasingly evident departure from their experts' advice. However, trust in politicians deteriorated as the pandemic progressed, most dramatically in the USA, less so in SA and Germany, due to the politicization of the pandemic. The analysis is limited to events during 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 517
页数:19
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Abdool-Karim S.S.K., 2021, 6 RISG RES INN BIENN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, President Cyril Ramaphosa receives recommendations from Presidential Commission on 4IR
[3]  
Baloyi T., 2020, S AFRICAN 0909
[4]   Call for transparency of COVI D-19 models [J].
Barton, C. Michael ;
Alberti, Marina ;
Ames, Daniel ;
Atkinson, Jo-An ;
Bales, Jerad ;
Burke, Edmund ;
Chen, Min ;
Diallo, Saikou Y. ;
Earn, David J. D. ;
Fath, Brian ;
Feng, Zhilan ;
Gibbons, Christopher ;
Hammond, Ross ;
Heffernan, Jane ;
Houser, Heather ;
Hovmand, Peter S. ;
Kopainsky, Birgit ;
Mabry, Patricia L. ;
Mair, Christina ;
Meier, Petra ;
Niles, Rebecca ;
Nosek, Brian ;
Osgood, Nathaniel ;
Pierce, Suzanne ;
Polhill, J. Gareth ;
Prosser, Lisa ;
Robinson, Erin ;
Rosenzweig, Cynthia ;
Sankaran, Shankar ;
Stange, Kurt ;
Tucker, Gregory .
SCIENCE, 2020, 368 (6490) :482-483
[5]   What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda [J].
Bauer, Martin W. ;
Allum, Nick ;
Miller, Steve .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (01) :79-95
[6]  
Bogner A., 2021, LEVIATHAN, V49, P111, DOI [https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2021-1-111, DOI 10.5771/0340-0425-2021-1-111]
[7]   The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics [J].
Brown, Mark B. .
MINERVA, 2008, 46 (04) :485-489
[8]  
Buchsteiner R., 2020, REDAKTIONSNETZWERK D
[9]  
BusinessTech, 2021, S AFRICAS 3 ALCOHOL
[10]  
Caboz J., 2020, BUSINESS INSIDE 0320