The impacts of different bidding segment numbers on bidding strategies of generation companies

被引:18
作者
Wang, L. [1 ,2 ]
Yu, C. W. [2 ]
Wen, F. S. [3 ]
机构
[1] State Power Econ Res Inst, Beijing 100761, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] S China Univ Technol, Coll Elect Engn, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
关键词
electricity market; bidding strategy; marginal segment; price-taker; self-scheduling;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2007.04.002
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In a competitive electricity market, generation companies design bidding strategies to maximize their individual profits subject to the constraints imposed by bidding rules. For a generation company, obviously, the optimal bidding strategy and hence the potential of exercising market power may be different if different bidding rules are employed. Hence, a well-designed bidding protocol is vital to the effective and efficient operation of an electricity market. Based on the widely used stepwise bidding rules, the impacts of different numbers of bidding segments on the bidding strategies of generation companies are investigated. This study is focused on a price-taker generation company in an electricity market. A probabilisic model is used to simulate electricity price in the competitive market environment. With a given number of bidding segments, the optimal bidding strategy for a price-taker generation company is then developed. The effects of risk preferences as well as information asymmetry on the optimal bidding strategy are also examined. With particular references to the impacts of different numbers of bidding segments on the optimal bidding strategy, a numerical example is employed to demonstrate the validity of the proposed model and methodology. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 463
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market [J].
Arroyo, JM ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (03) :1098-1104
[2]   Optimal offering strategies for generation companies operating in electricity spot markets [J].
Baillo, A ;
Ventosa, M ;
Rivier, M ;
Ramos, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (02) :745-753
[3]  
*CAL ISO, 2003, RED ALL NUMB ADJ BID
[4]   Price-taker bidding strategy under price uncertainty [J].
Conejo, AJ ;
Nogales, FJ ;
Arroyo, JM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (04) :1081-1088
[5]   Bidding strategies for electricity producers in a competitive electricity marketplace [J].
Gountis, VP ;
Bakirtzis, AG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (01) :356-365
[6]   TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS SUPPORTED BY POWER-TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
GUERRERO, VM .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1993, 12 (01) :37-48
[7]   Thermal power generation scheduling by simulated competition [J].
Huse, ES ;
Wangensteen, I ;
Faanes, HH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1999, 14 (02) :472-477
[8]   Forecasting next-day electricity prices by time series models [J].
Nogales, FJ ;
Contreras, J ;
Conejo, AJ ;
Espínola, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (02) :342-348
[9]   Meet the emerging transmission market segments [J].
Rahimi, FA ;
Vojdani, A .
IEEE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN POWER, 1999, 12 (01) :26-32
[10]   Bidding strategy design for different types of electric power market participants [J].
Rodriguez, CP ;
Anders, GJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (02) :964-971