Private road supply in networks with heterogeneous users

被引:4
作者
Fu, Xinying [1 ]
van den Berg, Vincent A. C. [1 ,2 ]
Verhoef, Erik T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tinbergen Inst, Gustav Mahlerplein 117, NL-1082 MS Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Congestion pricing; Bottleneck model; Heterogeneity; Private supply; Distributional effects; BOTTLENECK MODEL; MORNING COMMUTE; ROUTE CHOICE; TOLL ROADS; CONGESTION; EQUILIBRIUM; COMPETITION; CAPACITY; DEMAND; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study different mixes of private and public supply of roads in a network with bottleneck congestion and heterogeneous users. There are two parallel links for one origin and destination pair and two groups of travellers, where the group with the higher value of time also has higher schedule delay values. Previous scholars argued that as users become more heterogeneous, they benefit more from product differentiation, making private supply of roads more efficient. However, we find that local monopoly power might also increase if there is a separating equilibrium, which is an equilibrium where at least one group only uses one private road due to the different combinations of toll and congestion of the two roads. The private road can thus increase its toll without worrying about the competition from the other road for this group: it has a local monopoly over them. This lowers the efficiency of private supply. The problem is especially severe with flat tolls, which are constant over the peak. With fine tolls which vary continuously over the day there tends to be a pooling equilibrium where both types use both roads and competition remains intense. Flat tolling is also worse for users than fine tolling, as it has higher generalized prices.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 443
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EC URBAN TRANSPORTAT, DOI [10.4324/9780203642306, DOI 10.4324/9780203642306]
[2]   ROUTE CHOICE WITH HETEROGENEOUS DRIVERS AND GROUP-SPECIFIC CONGESTION COSTS [J].
ARNOTT, R ;
DEPALMA, A ;
LINDSEY, R .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1992, 22 (01) :71-102
[3]   Assessing the welfare effects of congestion charges in a real world setting [J].
Borjesson, Maria ;
Kristoffersson, Ida .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 70 :339-355
[4]   Peak-load pricing of a transportation route with an unpriced substitute [J].
Braid, RM .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1996, 40 (02) :179-197
[5]   Competition between highway operators: Can we expect toll differentiation? [J].
Calcott, P ;
Yao, ST .
PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2005, 84 (04) :615-626
[6]   Viability of new road infrastructure with heterogeneous users [J].
Cantos-Sanchez, Pedro ;
Moner-Colonques, Rafael ;
Sempere-Monerris, Jose J. ;
Alvarez-SanJaime, Oscar .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2011, 45 (05) :435-450
[7]   Solving the step-tolled bottleneck model with general user heterogeneity [J].
Chen, Hongyu ;
Liu, Yang ;
Nie, Yu .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2015, 81 :210-229
[8]   Private roads, competition, and incentives to adopt time-based congestion tolling [J].
de Palma, A ;
Lindsey, R .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2002, 52 (02) :217-241
[9]  
EDELSON NM, 1971, AM ECON REV, V61, P873
[10]  
Hall J. D, 2013, P KUHM NECTAR C TRAN