Is economics of restoration helping with decision-making challenges? Insights guided by bibliometrics

被引:3
作者
Luz, Maria Luiza Almeida [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Fac Econ Management Accounting & Publ Policy FACE, Ctr Environm & Agr Econ Res CEEMA, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Bibliometrics; Economics of restoration; Ecological restoration; Co-citation; Bibliographic coupling; STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; CONTINGENT VALUATION; LANDSCAPE RESTORATION; BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS; STREAM RESTORATION; LAND DEGRADATION; RIVER-BASIN; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100674
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Society is already seeing the ecological and economic benefits from restoration projects. However, the challenge is much bigger than the current efforts from ecologists and economists around the world. The Economics of Restoration is the interdisciplinary research field that is believed to have the necessary tools and instruments to solve this restoration gap, yet a better use and understanding of economic aspects and concepts are still needed. A bibliometric analysis of the field of economics of restoration was done in this study. Bibliometrics can offer insights on the intellectual structure of a discipline and thus indicate future paths for research development. The goal of this study was to identify important and influential economics of restoration research themes and key topics that will strengthen decision-making processes for restoration actions if better addressed in the future. The analysis reveals that few studies go beyond costs, lacking a full estimation of benefits. Economic concepts of uncertainty, public goods and specificity of natural capital are not well incorporated yet, and the relationship between governments and markets, as well as the one between communities and investments, require more attention to scale-up restoration worldwide. This study is believed to be the first one using bibliometrics to guide a discussion around economics of restoration and can be subsequentially replicated in other disciplines.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 193 条
  • [61] Habitat and Resource Equivalency Analysis: A Critical Assessment
    Desvousges, William H.
    Gard, Nicholas
    Michael, Holly J.
    Chance, Anne D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 143 : 74 - 89
  • [62] Deutz A., 2020, FINANCING NATURE CLO
  • [63] Bibliometric approach of factors affecting scientific productivity in environmental sciences and ecology
    Dragos, Cristian Mihai
    Dragos, Simona Laura
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 449 : 184 - 188
  • [64] Bibliometric mapping on sustainable development at the base-of-the-pyramid
    Du, Helen S.
    Xu, Jiahong
    Li, Zhanyao
    Liu, Yang
    Chu, Samuel Kai Wah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 281
  • [65] Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
    Engel, Stefanie
    Pagiola, Stefano
    Wunder, Sven
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (04) : 663 - 674
  • [66] Estimating the Provision of Ecosystem Services by Gulf of Mexico Coastal Wetlands
    Engle, Virginia D.
    [J]. WETLANDS, 2011, 31 (01) : 179 - 193
  • [67] Interdisciplinary and multi-institutional higher learning: reflecting on a South African case study investigating complex and dynamic environmental challenges
    Esler, K. J.
    Downsborough, L.
    Roux, D. J.
    Blignaut, J.
    Milton, S.
    le Maitre, D.
    de Wit, M. P.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 19 : 76 - 86
  • [68] Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes
    Evans, Megan C.
    Carwardine, Josie
    Fensham, Rod J.
    Butler, Don W.
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Martin, Tara G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 50 : 114 - 129
  • [69] The benefits of fringing mangrove systems to Mumbai
    Everard, Mark
    Jha, Rohit R. S.
    Russell, Shaun
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 24 (02) : 256 - 274
  • [70] FAO, 2017, SUSTAINABLE FINANCIN