Improving accuracy of genomic prediction in Brangus cattle by adding animals with imputed low-density SNP genotypes

被引:11
作者
Lopes, F. B. [1 ,2 ]
Wu, X. -L. [1 ,2 ]
Li, H. [1 ,2 ]
Xu, J. [2 ,3 ]
Perkins, T. [4 ]
Genho, J. [5 ]
Ferretti, R. [2 ]
Tait, R. G., Jr. [2 ]
Bauck, S. [2 ]
Rosa, G. J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Anim Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] GeneSeek, Biostat & Bioinformat, Lincoln, NE 68504 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Stat, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Int Brangus Breeders Assoc, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Livestock Genet Serv LLC, Woodville, VA USA
关键词
beef cattle; cross-validation; de-regression; genomic prediction; genotype imputation; ESTIMATED BREEDING VALUES; GENETIC EVALUATION; CROSS-VALIDATION; INFORMATION; REGRESSION; RELIABILITY; MODELS; LASSO;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12312
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Reliable genomic prediction of breeding values for quantitative traits requires the availability of sufficient number of animals with genotypes and phenotypes in the training set. As of 31 October 2016, there were 3,797 Brangus animals with genotypes and phenotypes. These Brangus animals were genotyped using different commercial SNP chips. Of them, the largest group consisted of 1,535 animals genotyped by the GGP-LDV4 SNP chip. The remaining 2,262 genotypes were imputed to the SNP content of the GGP-LDV4 chip, so that the number of animals available for training the genomic prediction models was more than doubled. The present study showed that the pooling of animals with both original or imputed 40K SNP genotypes substantially increased genomic prediction accuracies on the ten traits. By supplementing imputed genotypes, the relative gains in genomic prediction accuracies on estimated breeding values (EBV) were from 12.60% to 31.27%, and the relative gain in genomic prediction accuracies on de-regressed EBV was slightly small (i.e. 0.87%-18.75%). The present study also compared the performance of five genomic prediction models and two cross-validation methods. The five genomic models predicted EBV and de-regressed EBV of the ten traits similarly well. Of the two cross-validation methods, leave-one-out cross-validation maximized the number of animals at the stage of training for genomic prediction. Genomic prediction accuracy (GPA) on the ten quantitative traits was validated in 1,106 newly genotyped Brangus animals based on the SNP effects estimated in the previous set of 3,797 Brangus animals, and they were slightly lower than GPA in the original data. The present study was the first to leverage currently available genotype and phenotype resources in order to harness genomic prediction in Brangus beef cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 27
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle [J].
Hassani, Saeed ;
Saatchi, Mahdi ;
Fernando, Rohan L. ;
Garrick, Dorian J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2015, 47
[22]   Characterization of experimental cattle populations from Argentina with a low-density SNP genotyping panel [J].
Michiels, Brian ;
Pardo, Alan Maxs ;
Ortega Masague, Maria F. ;
Giovambattista, Guillermo ;
Corva, Pablo M. .
ANIMAL GENETICS, 2023, 54 (01) :68-72
[23]   Evaluation of INDUSCHIP-1 and selected low-density SNP panel for imputation to higher density in Gir dairy cattle of Gujarat [J].
Thakkar, R. S. ;
Nayee, N. G. ;
Vataliya, P. H. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2022, 92 (06) :751-756
[24]   Evaluation of low-density SNP panels and imputation for cost-effective genomic selection in four aquaculture species [J].
Kriaridou, Christina ;
Tsairidou, Smaragda ;
Fraslin, Clemence ;
Gorjanc, Gregor ;
Looseley, Mark E. E. ;
Johnston, Ian A. A. ;
Houston, Ross D. D. ;
Robledo, Diego .
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2023, 14
[25]   Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle [J].
Naserkheil, Masoumeh ;
Lee, Deuk Hwan ;
Mehrban, Hossein .
BMC GENETICS, 2020, 21 (01)
[26]   The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa [J].
Aliloo, H. ;
Mrode, R. ;
Okeyo, A. M. ;
Ni, G. ;
Goddard, M. E. ;
Gibson, J. P. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (10) :9108-9127
[27]   Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in dairy cattle using the biologically annotated neural networks framework [J].
Wang, Xue ;
Shi, Shaolei ;
Khan, Md. Yousuf Ali ;
Zhang, Zhe ;
Zhang, Yi .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01)
[28]   Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending [J].
Xiujin Li ;
Sheng Wang ;
Ju Huang ;
Leyi Li ;
Qin Zhang ;
Xiangdong Ding .
Genetics Selection Evolution, 46
[29]   Effects of SNP marker density and training population size on prediction accuracy in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genomic selection [J].
Wang, Hu ;
Bai, Yuguang ;
Biligetu, Bill .
PLANT GENOME, 2024, 17 (01)
[30]   Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle [J].
Saeed Hassani ;
Mahdi Saatchi ;
Rohan L. Fernando ;
Dorian J. Garrick .
Genetics Selection Evolution, 47