Importance of D1 receptors for associative components of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization and conditioned activity:: a study using D1 receptor knockout mice

被引:19
作者
McDougall, SA [1 ]
Reichel, CM [1 ]
Cyr, MC [1 ]
Karper, PE [1 ]
Nazarian, A [1 ]
Crawford, CA [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Psychol, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
关键词
behavioral sensitization; D-1 receptor knockout mice; amphetamine; conditioned activity; associative processes;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-005-0146-9
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: Repeated exposure to psychostimulant drugs results in conditioned activity and behavioral sensitization. Nonassociative cellular changes are necessary for behavioral sensitization, while associative processes appear to modify the sensitized response. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the absence of the D, receptor would disrupt associative processes modulating sensitization and conditioned activity. Methods: Wild-type and D-1 receptor knockout mice (i.e., D-1-deficient mice) were injected with amphetamine (AMPH; 8 mg/kg, IP) before being placed in a previously novel test chamber (AMPH-Test group) or before being returned to the home cage (AMPH-Home group). Separate groups of mice were injected with saline (SAL) at the same time points. Distance traveled was measured 60 min each day, with the preexposure phase lasting 1 or 7 days. Sensitization was subsequently assessed after an injection of AMPH (1 mg/kg, IP), while conditioned activity was assessed after an injection of SAL. Results: After a 1-day preexposure phase, wild-type and D-1-deficient mice exhibited similar patterns of sensitization and conditioned activity. After a 7-day preexposure phase, (1) D-1-deficient mice exhibited more robust context-specific sensitization than wild-type mice, (2) only D-1-deficient mice showed context-independent sensitization, and (3) only D-1-deficient mice showed conditioned activity. Conclusions: Repeatedly treating D-1-deficient mice with AMPH appears to cause a general increase in responsivity. The reason for this hyper-responsivity is uncertain, but it is possible that cues from the testing environment were unable to inhibit responding (i.e., associative processes were disrupted). Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms (e.g., increases in D-2-like receptors) may affect processes underlying sensitization and conditioned activity.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 30
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Differential effects of dopamine antagonists on locomotor activity, conditioned activity and conditioned place preference induced by cocaine in rats
    Adams, JU
    Careri, JM
    Efferen, TR
    Rotrosen, J
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 12 (08): : 603 - 611
  • [2] Amphetamine induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty
    Ahmed, SH
    Oberling, P
    DiScala, G
    Sandner, G
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 123 (04) : 325 - 332
  • [3] Ahmed SH, 1998, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V112, P1167
  • [4] Memory processes governing amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization
    Anagnostaras, SG
    Schallert, T
    Robinson, TE
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 26 (06) : 703 - 715
  • [5] Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: Modulation by associative learning
    Anagnostaras, SG
    Robinson, TE
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 110 (06) : 1397 - 1414
  • [6] Environmental modulation of amphetamine-induced c-fos expression in D1 versus D2 striatal neurons
    Badiani, A
    Oates, MM
    Day, HEW
    Watson, SJ
    Akil, H
    Robinson, TE
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 103 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [7] Drug-induced neurobehavioral plasticity: the role of environmental context
    Badiani, A
    Robinson, TE
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 15 (5-6): : 327 - 339
  • [8] Badiani A, 1997, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V282, P787
  • [9] Badiani A, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P10579
  • [10] Exposure to repeated, intermittent d-amphetamine induces sensitization of HPA axis to a subsequent stressor
    Barr, AM
    Hofmann, CE
    Weinberg, J
    Phillips, AG
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 26 (03) : 286 - 294