Response of soft clay strata and clay-pile-raft systems to seismic shaking

The behavior of pile foundations under earthquake loading is an important factor affecting the performance of structures. Observations from past earthquakes have shown that piles in firm soils generally perform well, while the performance of piles in soft or liquefied ground can raise some questions. Centrifuge model tests were carried out at the National University of Singapore to investigate the response of pile-soil system under three different earthquake excitations. Some initial tests were done on kaolin clay beds to understand the pure clay behavior under repetitive earthquake shaking. Pile foundations comprising of solid steel, hollow steel and hollow steel pile filled with cement in-fill were then embedded in the kaolin clay beds to study the response of clay-pile system. Superstructural inertial loading on the foundation was modeled by fastening steel weight on top of the model raft. The model test results show that strain softening and stiffness degradation feature strongly in the behaviour of the clay. In uniform clay beds without piles, this is manifested as an increase in resonance periods of the surface response with level of shaking and with successive earthquakes. For the pile systems tested, the effect of the surrounding soft clay was primarily to impose an inertial loading onto the piles, thereby increasing the natural period of the piles over and above that of the pile foundation alone. There is also some evidence that the relative motion between piles and soil leads to aggravated softening of the soil around the pile, thereby lengthening its resonance period of the soil further. The centrifuge model tests were back-analyzed using the finite element code ABAQUS. The analysis shows that the simple non-linear hypoelastic soil model gave reasonably good agreement with the experimental observations. The engineering implication arising from this study so far is that, for the case of relatively short piles in soft clays, the ground surface motions may not be representative of the raft motion. Other than the very small earthquakes, the raft motion has a shorter resonance period than the surrounding soil.