Comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain control schemes for shunt active filters

被引:0
|
作者
Sonnenschein, M [1 ]
Weinhold, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Lehrstuhl Erzeugung & Anwendung Elekt Energie, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The proliferation of power electronic loads with a non-linear relationship between voltages and currents has led to increasing current and voltage distortion in distribution systems. With the development of active filters based on pulse-width modulation (PWM) converters, an effective tool to improve voltage quality is available. In this paper the characteristics of two control algorithms for the control of shunt active filters and their practical implementation are compared. The first one is based on the so-called Fryze-Buchholz-Depenbrock (FBD) method which calculates and compensates the non-active load currents using time-domain algorithm such that the supply network provides purely active currents. The other one identifies and compensates preselected harmonic components of the line currents using a frequency detection algorithm. This approach reduces the power rating of the compensator.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 16
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of frequency measurement between time-domain and frequency-domain in DSO
    Wei, J
    Chen, CL
    2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS: VOL 1: COMMUNICATION THEORY AND SYSTEMS, 2005, : 808 - 811
  • [2] An analysis and comparison of frequency-domain and time-domain input shaping
    Pao, LY
    Cutforth, CF
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 1998, : 3072 - 3074
  • [3] Time-domain versus frequency-domain effort weighting in active noise control design
    Friot, Emmanuel
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 141 (01): : EL11 - EL15
  • [4] Comparison of frequency-domain and time-domain fluorescence lifetime tomography
    Kumar, Anand T. N.
    Raymond, Scott B.
    Bacskai, Brian J.
    Boas, David A.
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2008, 33 (05) : 470 - 472
  • [5] COMPARISON OF TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES IN ANTENNA THEORY
    YOUNG, JD
    SVOBODA, DE
    BURNSIDE, WD
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1973, AP21 (04) : 581 - 583
  • [6] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    Hernandez-Becerra, P. A. I.
    Balleza-Ordaz, M.
    Vargas-Luna, M.
    Delgadillo-Holtfort, I.
    INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 62 (02) : 241 - 246
  • [7] ON FREQUENCY-DOMAIN AND TIME-DOMAIN PHASE UNWRAPPING
    ZIMMERMANN, KP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1987, 75 (04) : 519 - 520
  • [8] Time-domain and frequency-domain differential calorimetry
    Ferrari, C
    Salvetti, G
    Tognoni, E
    Tombari, E
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS, 1996, 47 (01): : 75 - 85
  • [9] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    P. A. I. Hernández-Becerra
    M. Balleza-Ordaz
    M. Vargas-Luna
    I. Delgadillo-Holtfort
    Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 2019, 62 : 241 - 246
  • [10] Comparison between a time-domain and a frequency-domain system for optical tomography
    Nissila, Ilkka
    Lipiainen, Lauri
    Hebden, Jeremy C.
    Katila, Toivo
    Jennions, David
    Heino, Jenni
    Schweiger, Martin
    Kotilahti, Kalle
    Noponen, Tommi
    Gibson, Adam
    Jarvenpaa, Seppo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2006, 11 (06)