Epistemic Equality: Distributive Epistemic Justice in the Context of Justification

被引:5
作者
Miller, Boaz [1 ,2 ]
Pinto, Meital [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Adv Internet Studies, Bochum, Germany
[2] Zefat Acad Coll, Dept Management Informat Syst, Safed, Israel
[3] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Zefat Acad, Coll Sch Law, Safed, Israel
[5] Ono Acad Coll, Fac Law, Kiryat Ono, Israel
关键词
epistemic injustice; testimonial injustice; distributive justice; discrimination; DISCRIMINATION; SCIENCE; EXPERTS;
D O I
10.1353/ken.2022.0011
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Social inequality may obstruct the generation of knowledge, as the rich and powerful may bring about social acceptance of skewed views that suit their interests. Epistemic equality in the context of justification is a means of preventing such obstruction. Drawing on social epistemology and theories of equality and distributive justice, we provide an account of epistemic equality. We regard participation in, and influence over a knowledge-generating discourse in an epistemic community as a limited good that needs to be justly distributed among putative members of the community. We argue that rather than trying to operationally formulate an exact criterion for distributing this good, epistemic equality may be realized by insisting on active participation of members of three groups in addition to credited experts: relevant disempowered groups, relevant uncredited experts, and relevant stakeholders. Meeting these conditions fulfills the political, moral, and epistemic aims of epistemic equality.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 203
页数:32
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1955, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1970, CRITICISM GROW KNOWL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, What can she know? Feminist epistemology and the construction of knowledge
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1974, BLACK SOCIOLOGISTS H
[5]  
Aristotle, 2000, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS
[6]   Masking Disagreement among Experts [J].
Beatty, John .
EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2006, 3 (1-2) :52-67
[7]   Amending and defending Critical Contextual Empiricism [J].
Borgerson, Kirstin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 1 (03) :435-449
[8]  
Bowler PeterJ., 2005, Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey
[9]   Distributing Epistemic Authority: Refining Norton's Pragmatist Approach to Environmental Decision-Making [J].
Brister, Evelyn .
CONTEMPORARY PRAGMATISM, 2012, 9 (01) :185-203
[10]  
Cartwright Nancy., 2020, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, V120, P237, DOI DOI 10.1093/ARISOC/AOAA015