Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment

被引:85
作者
Smith, Wake [1 ,2 ]
Wagner, Gernot [3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Trumbull Coll, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Coll, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Ctr Environm, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2018年 / 13卷 / 12期
关键词
solar geoengineering; albedo modification; solar radiation management; high-altitude aircraft; CLIMATE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/aae98d
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We review the capabilities and costs of various lofting methods intended to deliver sulfates into the lower stratosphere. We lay out a future solar geoengineering deployment scenario of halving the increase in anthropogenic radiative forcing beginning 15 years hence, by deploying material to altitudes as high as similar to 20 km. After surveying an exhaustive list of potential deployment techniques, we settle upon an aircraft-based delivery system. Unlike the one prior comprehensive study on the topic (McClellan et al 2012 Environ. Res. Lett. 7 034019), we conclude that no existing aircraft design-even with extensive modifications-can reasonably fulfill this mission. However, we also conclude that developing a new, purpose-built high-altitude tanker with substantial payload capabilities would neither be technologically difficult nor prohibitively expensive. We calculate early-year costs of similar to$1500 ton(-1) of material deployed, resulting in average costs of similar to$2.25 billion yr(-1) over the first 15 years of deployment. We further calculate the number of flights at similar to 4000 in year one, linearly increasing by similar to 4000 yr(-1). We conclude by arguing that, while cheap, such an aircraft-based program would unlikely be a secret, given the need for thousands of flights annually by airliner-sized aircraft operating from an international array of bases.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, US GLOB CHANG RES PR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Sipri military expenditure database
[4]   The incredible economics of geoengineering [J].
Barrett, Scott .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 39 (01) :45-54
[5]  
Boren HE, 1976, COMPUTER MODEL ESTIM
[6]   What do people think when they think about solar geoengineering? A review of empirical social science literature, and prospects for future research [J].
Burns, Elizabeth T. ;
Flegal, Jane A. ;
Keith, David W. ;
Mahajan, Aseem ;
Tingley, Dustin ;
Wagner, Gernot .
EARTHS FUTURE, 2016, 4 (11) :536-542
[7]  
Chang K., 2018, NY TIMES
[8]   Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? [J].
Crutzen, Paul J. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 77 (3-4) :211-219
[9]   Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering [J].
Dai, Z. ;
Weisenstein, D. K. ;
Keith, D. W. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (02) :1030-1039
[10]   Geoengineering: The Next Era of Geopolitics? [J].
Dalby, Simon .
GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2015, 9 (04) :190-201