Flow behaviors, reaction kinetics, and optimal design of fixed- and fluidized-beds for CO2 methanation

被引:31
作者
Ngo, Son Ich [1 ]
Lim, Young-Il [1 ]
Lee, Doyeon [2 ]
Go, Kang Seok [2 ]
Seo, Myung Won [2 ]
机构
[1] Hankyong Natl Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Ctr Sustainable Proc Engn CoSPE, Anseong 17579, Jungang Ro, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Energy Res, Climate Change Res Div, Daejeon 34129, Gajeong Ro, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Power-to-gas; CO2; methanation; Fixed-bed; Bubbling fluidized-bed; Heterogeneous catalytic reaction model; Two-phase reaction model; POWER-TO-GAS; HEAT-TRANSFER; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; MODEL; HYDRODYNAMICS; GASIFICATION; LIMITATIONS; OPERATION; GASIFIER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117886
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The performances of three catalytic reactors for CO2 methanation, i.e., single fixed-bed (1FxB), two-stage fixed-bed (2FxB), and bubbling fluidized-bed (BFB), were evaluated at a feed flow rate of 166.5 Nm(3)/h. A heterogeneous catalytic reaction model (HCRM) combining the one-dimensional plug-flow model on the reactor scale and the reaction-diffusion model on the particle scale was used for 1FxB and 2FxB. A two-phase reaction model (TPRM), including the mass transfer between the bubble and emulsion phases and axial dispersion, was proposed for the BFB. The results from HCRM and TPRM were in good agreement with experimental and modeling data. The 1FxB, 2FxB, and BFB were optimized via the parametric study considering the hot spot temperature, operating temperature and pressure, space velocity, flue gas recirculation ratio, and operational stability. The catalyst weights of 1FxB, 2FxB, and BFB required for a 90% CO2 conversion were 191, 40, and 34 kg, respectively. The proposed models were able to identify the flow behaviors, mass transfer, and reaction kinetics of the fixed- and fluidized-beds, which are useful for the optimal design of CO2 methanation reactors.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Kinetics study and modelling of steam methane reforming process over a NiO/Al2O3 catalyst in an adiabatic packed bed reactor
    Abbas, S. Z.
    Dupont, V.
    Mahmud, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (05) : 2889 - 2903
  • [2] Developing Ni-based honeycomb-type catalysts using different binary oxide-supported species for synergistically enhanced CO2 methanation activity
    Ahn, Jeong Yoon
    Chang, Soon Woong
    Lee, Sang Moon
    Kim, Sung Su
    Chung, Woo Jin
    Lee, Jung Chul
    Cho, Yong Joo
    Shin, Kyung Sook
    Moon, Dea Hyun
    Dinh Duc Nguyen
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 250 : 277 - 284
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, VDI Heat Atlas, VSecond
  • [4] P2G movable modular plant operation on synthetic methane production from CO2 and hydrogen from renewables sources
    Bassano, Claudia
    Deiana, Paolo
    Lietti, Luca
    Visconti, Carlo Giorgio
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 253 : 1071 - 1079
  • [5] Operation range extension via hot- spot control for catalytic CO2 methanation reactors
    Bremer, Jens
    Sundmacher, Kai
    [J]. REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2019, 4 (06): : 1019 - 1037
  • [6] Pilot plant initial results for the methanation process using CO2 from amine scrubbing at the Laziska power plant in Poland
    Chwola, Tadeusz
    Spietz, Tomasz
    Wieclaw-Solny, Lucyna
    Tatarczuk, Adam
    Krotki, Aleksander
    Dobras, Szymon
    Wilk, Andrzej
    Tchorz, Janusz
    Stec, Marcin
    Zdeb, Janusz
    [J]. FUEL, 2020, 263
  • [7] Optimal design of a sleeve-type steam methane reforming reactor for hydrogen production from natural gas
    Dan Duc Nguyen
    Son Ich Ngo
    Lim, Young-Il
    Kim, Woohyun
    Lee, Uen-Do
    Seo, Dongju
    Yoon, Wang-Lai
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (03) : 1973 - 1987
  • [8] Davidson JF, 1978, FLUID P 2 ENG FDN C
  • [9] HEAT-TRANSFER IN PACKED-BEDS
    DEWASCH, AP
    FROMENT, GF
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1972, 27 (03) : 567 - &
  • [10] Fixed bed catalytic reactor modellinguthe radial heat transfer problem
    Dixon, Anthony G.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 90 (03) : 507 - 527