Methodological pitfalls in the study of religiosity and spirituality

被引:68
作者
Berry, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Nursing, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
spirituality; religiosity; methodology; measurement; history;
D O I
10.1177/0193945905275519
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The number of studies demonstrating a relationship between religiosity and spirituality and physical and psychological health have increased rapidly during the past decade. There are significant disputes in the literature regarding the methodological quality of research in this area. Despite nursing scholars' interest in this area, no thorough review of the methodological critiques is available. The purpose of this study is to review areas of methodological difficulty in the study of religiosity and spirituality by identifying contemporary methodological critiques, critically evaluating the critiques and the underlying issues, and making suggestions for methodological advancement in the field. Three main areas of methodological critique exist: construct measurement, study design, and data analysis. Research in this area should aim for conceptual clarity, deliberate design, and appropriate analysis. Considerations of these critiques are instructive for nursing research done in the area of religiosity and spirituality.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 647
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Allport G.W., 1950, INDIVIDUAL HIS RELIG
[2]  
Ameling A, 2001, J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv, V39, P14
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1929, VARIETIES RELIG EXPE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, RES RELIG ED
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 5 DIMENSION EXPLORAT
[6]  
Balducci L, 2001, Cancer Control, V8, P368
[7]  
Berry Devon, 2002, Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res, V8, P875
[8]   CHURCH ATTENDANCE AND HEALTH [J].
COMSTOCK, GW ;
PARTRIDGE, KB .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1972, 25 (12) :665-672
[9]  
Durkheim Emile., 1997, SUICIDE
[10]  
Frankl V.E., 1985, MANS SEARCH MEANING