'Peer review' culture

被引：16
作者：
Atkinson, M
机构：
[1] Jamberoo, NSW 2533, Golden Gully Road
来源：
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS | 2001年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词：
judgement; opinion testing; peer status; referee function; review management; statistics;
D O I：
10.1007/s11948-001-0040-8
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
A relatively high incidence of unsatisfactory review decisions is widely recognised and acknowledged as 'the peer review problem'. Factors contributing to this problem are identified and examined. Specific examples of unreasonable rejection are considered. It is concluded that weaknesses of the 'peer review' system are significant and that they are well known or readily recognisable bur that necessary counter-measures are not always enforced. Careful management is necessary to discount hollow opinion or error in review comment. Review and referee functions should be quite separate.
引用
收藏
页码：193 / 204
页数：12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ADAIR RK, 1982, PEER COMMENTARY PEER, P12
[2]   Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation [J].
Armstrong J.S. .
Science and Engineering Ethics, 1997, 3 (1) :63-84
[3]   REGULATION OF SCIENCE BY PEER-REVIEW [J].
ATKINSON, M .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1994, 25 (02) :147-158
[4]  
BERNARD A, 1991, ROTTEN REJECTIONS, P65
[5]  
Campanario JM, 1997, SCIENTIST, V11, P9
[6]  
Carter R., 1998, Mapping the mind
[7]  
DAWKINS R, 1996, CLIMBING MOUNT IMPRO, P65
[8]  
Durso TW, 1997, SCIENTIST, V11, P13
[9]  
Friedman RM., 1989, Appropriating the weather. Vilhelm Bjerkness and the construction of amodern meteorology
[10]  
GLIEK J, 1988, CHAOS, P132
123