Sex-specific attenuation of impulsive action by progesterone in a go/no-go task for cocaine in rats

被引:7
作者
Swalve, Natashia [1 ]
Smethells, John R. [2 ]
Younk, Rebecca [3 ]
Mitchell, Jared [3 ]
Dougen, Ben [3 ]
Carroll, Marilyn E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Alma Coll, Dept Psychol, Alma, MI 48801 USA
[2] Minneapolis Med Res Fdn Inc, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55414 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychiat, MMC 392 UMHC, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Drug addiction; Go/no-go; Impulsive action; Progesterone; Rats; Sex differences; SELF-ADMINISTERED COCAINE; LOW SACCHARIN INTAKE; REACTION-TIME-TASK; FEMALE RATS; INTRAVENOUS COCAINE; DRUG-ADDICTION; ANIMAL-MODELS; ESTROUS-CYCLE; EXOGENOUS PROGESTERONE; RESPONSE-INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-017-4750-2
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous work indicated that progesterone (PRO) reduced impulsive choice for cocaine in female but not male rats (Smethells et al. Psychopharmacology 233:2999-3008, 2016). Impulsive action, typically measured by responding for a reinforcer during a signaled period of nonavailability of natural reinforcers, predicts initiation and escalation of drug use in animals and humans. The present study examined impulsive action for cocaine using PRO in male and female rats trained on a go/no-go task. Rats were trained on a go/no-go task to respond for cocaine infusions (0.4 mg/kg/inf). During the "go" component, responding was reinforced on a VI 30-s schedule, whereas during the "no-go" component, withholding a response was reinforced on a differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) 30-s schedule. A response during the no-go component resets the DRO timer and served as a measure of impulsive action. After baseline responding was established, rats were pretreated with vehicle (VEH) or PRO (0.5 mg/kg), and DRO resets and responding during the go component for cocaine were compared in males vs. females. DRO resets were significantly lower following PRO treatment compared to VEH in female, but not male, rats. Response rates and overall infusions during the go component were not significantly altered by PRO in either females or males. Treatment with PRO resulted in a sex-specific reduction in impulsive action for cocaine, while not affecting cocaine self-administration.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 143
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Impulsivity on a Go/No-go task for intravenous cocaine or food in male and female rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake [J].
Anker, Justin J. ;
Gliddon, Luke A. ;
Carroll, Marilyn E. .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 19 (5-6) :615-629
[2]   Effects of progesterone on the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in female rats [J].
Anker, Justin J. ;
Larson, Erin B. ;
Gliddon, Luke A. ;
Carroll, Marilyn E. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 15 (05) :472-480
[3]   Effects of progesterone on escalation of intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats selectively bred for high or low saccharin intake [J].
Anker, Justin J. ;
Holtz, Nathan A. ;
Carroll, Marilyn E. .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 23 (02) :205-210
[4]  
Anker JJ, 2011, CURR TOP BEHAV NEURO, V8, P73, DOI 10.1007/7854_2010_93
[5]   Responding during signaled availability and nonavailability of iv cocaine and food in rats: age and sex differences [J].
Anker, Justin J. ;
Zlebnik, Natalie E. ;
Navin, Sean F. ;
Carroll, Marilyn E. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 215 (04) :785-799
[6]   Performance under a Go/No-go task in rats selected for high and low impulsivity with a delay-discounting procedure [J].
Anker, Justin J. ;
Zlebnik, Natalie E. ;
Gliddon, Luke A. ;
Carroll, Marilyn E. .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 20 (5-6) :406-414
[7]  
[Anonymous], GUID CAR US LAB AN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HHS PUBL
[9]   Sex differences in attentional processes in adult rats as measured by performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task [J].
Bayless, Daniel W. ;
Darling, Jeff S. ;
Stout, Willy J. ;
Daniel, Jill M. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2012, 235 (01) :48-54
[10]   Sex Differences in Animal Models: Focus on Addiction [J].
Becker, Jill B. ;
Koob, George F. .
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2016, 68 (02) :242-263