Evaluation and bias correction of global climate models in the CMIP5 over the Indian Ocean region

被引:17
作者
Mohan, Soumya [1 ]
Bhaskaran, Prasad K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Ocean Engn & Naval Architecture, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
关键词
GCMs; CMIP5; RCPs; Indian Ocean; GREENHOUSE-GAS CONCENTRATIONS; WIND-WAVE CLIMATE; SEA-SURFACE WIND; FUTURE CLIMATE; CHANGE IMPACT; SCENARIOS; PROJECTIONS; STABILIZATION; SIMULATIONS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-019-7700-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global climate model (GCM) simulations driven by various emission scenarios are widely used for the projections of future climate change. In this study, an assessment was carried out by using 35 GCMs under Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) in reproducing the present day wind speed changes over six selected regions in the Indian Ocean region based on altimetry-measured merged wind speed product in the Indian Ocean. The relative ranking of the GCMs is performed based on the evaluation of the CMIP5 historical simulations for the period 1993-2005. The skill level of GCMs in representing the various metrics such as annual mean, mean seasonal cycle, linear trend, correlation coefficient, and seasonal standard deviations was accounted for the relative ranking of the GCMs. The models CMCC-CESM, HadGEM2-ES, and GFDL-ESM2G are found to be better for the Arabian Sea region. The GCM products such as HadCM3, CSIRO-Mk3.6.0, HadGEM2-CC, HadGEM2-AO, and MIROC5 were noticed better for the Bay of Bengal (BoB) region. Large bias in wind speed (similar to 3 m/s) is observed for the head BoB and the Southern Ocean region. Bias corrections for the present-day Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) simulations (2006-2016) were performed based on quantile mapping (QM) method, and the present-day wind changes are also compared with observations. The findings from study recommend that suitable bias correction for different GCMs is an essential pre-requisite for climate change studies.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models [J].
Anav, A. ;
Friedlingstein, P. ;
Kidston, M. ;
Bopp, L. ;
Ciais, P. ;
Cox, P. ;
Jones, C. ;
Jung, M. ;
Myneni, R. ;
Zhu, Z. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (18) :6801-6843
[2]  
Bhaskaran PK, 2014, J Marine Sci: Res Dev, V01, DOI [10.4172/2155-9910.s11-005, DOI 10.4172/2155-9910.S11-005, 10.4172/2155-9910.S11-005]
[3]   CMIP5 Diversity in Southern Westerly Jet Projections Related to Historical Sea Ice Area: Strong Link to Strengthening and Weak Link to Shift [J].
Bracegirdle, Thomas J. ;
Hyder, Patrick ;
Holmes, Caroline R. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (01) :195-211
[4]   Significance of model credibility in estimating climate projection distributions for regional hydroclimatological risk assessments [J].
Brekke, Levi D. ;
Dettinger, Michael D. ;
Maurer, Edwin P. ;
Anderson, Michael .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 89 (3-4) :371-394
[5]   Bias Correction of GCM Precipitation by Quantile Mapping: How Well Do Methods Preserve Changes in Quantiles and Extremes? [J].
Cannon, Alex J. ;
Sobie, Stephen R. ;
Murdock, Trevor Q. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (17) :6938-6959
[6]   CMIP5-based global wave climate projections including the entire Arctic Ocean [J].
Casas-Prat, M. ;
Wang, X. L. ;
Swart, N. .
OCEAN MODELLING, 2018, 123 :66-85
[7]   A REVIEW OF SATELLITE ALTIMETER MEASUREMENT OF SEA-SURFACE WIND-SPEED - WITH A PROPOSED NEW ALGORITHM [J].
CHELTON, DB ;
MCCABE, PJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1985, 90 (NC3) :4707-4720
[8]   Future change of the Indian Ocean basin-wide and dipole modes in the CMIP5 [J].
Chu, Jung-Eun ;
Ha, Kyung-Ja ;
Lee, June-Yi ;
Wang, Bin ;
Kim, Byeong-Hee ;
Chung, Chul Eddy .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (1-2) :535-551
[9]  
Clarke L., 2007, Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations, P6
[10]  
De Souza K., 2015, VULNERABILITY CLIMAT