CHEMISTRY TEACHERS' ASSESSMENT LITERACY IN TURKEY

被引:1
作者
Yasar, Mehmet Diyaddin [1 ]
机构
[1] Harran Univ, Sci Educ Div, Math & Sci Educ Dept, TR-63190 Sanliurfa, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION | 2020年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
assessment literacy (AL); chemistry teachers (CTs); formative assessment techniques (FATs); Turkey; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.33225/jbse/20.19.76
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this research was to find out the assessment literacy level of chemistry teachers in Turkey. For the purpose of the research, different types of formative assessment techniques were included in the research. This research was conducted as a case study, which is a kind of qualitative research design. The participants in the research were 12 chemistry teachers working in different high schools in Sanliurfa, one of the largest cities in south-eastern Turkey in 2017-2018 spring term. Research data were collected with a semi-structured interview form. Content analysis was performed on the research data. According to the results, chemistry teachers did not have sufficient perception and knowledge about diagnostic and formative assessment. Chemistry teachers' perception related to objective of formative assessment techniques was very low and it was almost unfamiliar to them. Also, chemistry teachers had little perception about how formative assessment techniques should be prepared and what is their function. Their perception related to the interpretation/scoring of the results obtained from formative assessment techniques was almost non-existent. They had serious deficiencies related to formative assessment techniques and they focused on summative assessment rather than formative assessment and related techniques in their chemistry classes.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 90
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abell SK, 2011, PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE BASE OF SCIENCE TEACHING, P205, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_12
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Practice, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ONDOKUZ MAYIS U EGIT
[4]  
Bayat S., 2015, AMASYA ED J, V4, P118
[5]  
Bogdan C.Robert., 2007, Qualitative Research for Education An Introduction to Theories and Methods, V5th
[6]   A Case Study of Teacher Personal Practice Assessment Theories and Complexities of Implementing Formative Assessment [J].
Box, Cathy ;
Skoog, Gerald ;
Dabbs, Jennifer M. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (05) :956-983
[7]  
Buyukozturk S., 2008, Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri, V3rd
[8]   Examining chemistry teachers' use of curriculum materials: in view of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge [J].
Chen, Bo ;
Wei, Bing .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 16 (02) :260-272
[9]   Collaborative research for assessment for learning [J].
Cooper, Beverley ;
Cowie, Bronwen .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2010, 26 (04) :979-986
[10]  
Cowie B., 1999, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Practice, V6, P101, DOI DOI 10.1080/09695949993026