The Effect of Interpersonal Psychotherapy and other Psychodynamic Therapies versus 'Treatment as Usual' in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

被引:5
作者
Jakobsen, Janus Christian [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Jane Lindschou [1 ]
Simonsen, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Gluud, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Rigshosp 3344, Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp & Reg Zealand, Psychiat Res Unit, Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH-TREATMENT; COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH-PROGRAM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; NATIONAL-INSTITUTE; RATING-SCALE; PLUS PHARMACOTHERAPY; NIMH TREATMENT; RURAL UGANDA; CARE; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0019044
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Major depressive disorder afflicts an estimated 17% of individuals during their lifetimes at tremendous suffering and costs. Interpersonal psychotherapy and other psychodynamic therapies may be effective interventions for major depressive disorder, but the effects have only had limited assessment in systematic reviews. Methods/Principal Findings: Cochrane systematic review methodology with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials comparing the effect of psychodynamic therapies versus 'treatment as usual' for major depressive disorder. To be included the participants had to be older than 17 years with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Altogether, we included six trials randomizing a total of 648 participants. Five trials assessed 'interpersonal psychotherapy' and only one trial assessed 'psychodynamic psychotherapy'. All six trials had high risk of bias. Meta-analysis on all six trials showed that the psychodynamic interventions significantly reduced depressive symptoms on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (mean difference 23.12 (95% confidence interval -4.39 to -1.86; P < 0.00001), no heterogeneity) compared with 'treatment as usual'. Trial sequential analysis confirmed this result. Discussion: We did not find convincing evidence supporting or refuting the effect of interpersonal psychotherapy or psychodynamic therapy compared with 'treatment as usual' for patients with major depressive disorder. The potential beneficial effect seems small and effects on major outcomes are unknown. Randomized trials with low risk of systematic errors and low risk of random errors are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm04, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.DSM04]
[3]  
[Anonymous], REV MAN REVMAN COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[5]  
[Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE
[6]  
[Anonymous], PSIQUIATRIA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE
[8]  
[Anonymous], INT STAT CLASS DIS R
[9]  
[Anonymous], EFFECT PSYCHODYNAMIC
[10]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE MENTAL HLTH