Adolescent perspectives on the return of individual results in genomic addiction research

被引:7
作者
Coors, Marilyn E. [1 ]
Raymond, Kristen M. [2 ]
McWilliams, Shannon K. [2 ]
Hopfer, Christian J. [2 ]
Mikulich-Gilbertson, Susan K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Dept Psychiat, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychiat, Div Subst Dependence, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
adolescents; biobank; genomic addiction research; incidental results; re-contact; return of individual research results; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; GENETIC RESEARCH; PARTICIPANTS; PARENTS; ATTITUDES; CHILDREN; COHORT; RECOMMENDATIONS; EXPECTATIONS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1097/YPG.0000000000000083
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This study surveyed all adolescents who were enrolled in behavioral genomic research and provided DNA to a biobank, including 320 patients undergoing treatment for substance and conduct problems (SCPs) and 109 non-SCP controls. Participants selected from three options on the return of individual genomic results (RIR) and rated eight methods of re-contact. Most individuals with SCPs (77.8%) and non-SCP controls (72.5%) wanted RIR involving health or behavioral implications. The majority of individuals with SCPs (67.2%) and non-SCP controls (69.7%) indicated that phone re-contact was 'best', with e-mail (22.5% SCPs, 33.9% non-SCPs) and social networking websites (21.3% SCPs, 20.2% non-SCPs) being viable options. These results suggest a layered approach for RIR: phone calls, followed by e-mails and a secure message to a social networking account. Data from this special and vulnerable population, which includes youth involved in the criminal justice system and substantial minority participation, bring an essential and missing perspective to the discussion of RIR. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 130
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Savage, Sarah K.
    Green, Robert C.
    Juengst, Eric
    McGuire, Amy
    Kornetsky, Susan
    Brewster, Stephanie J.
    Joffe, Steven
    Taylor, Patrick
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (07) : 547 - 552
  • [42] Beneficence, Clinical Urgency, and the Return of Individual Research Results to Relatives
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Trinidad, Susan Brown
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Burke, Wylie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (10) : 9 - 10
  • [43] Disclosure of individual pharmacogenomic results in research projects: when and what kind of information to return to research participants
    Korol, Sandra
    Hurlimann, Thierry
    Godard, Beatrice
    de Denus, Simon
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2013, 14 (06) : 675 - 688
  • [44] Perspectives regarding family disclosure of genetic research results in three racial and ethnic minority populations
    Zhu, Xuan
    Basappa, Susanna N.
    Ridgeway, Jennifer L.
    Albertie, Monica L.
    Pantoja, Elizabeth
    Prescott, Darin
    Radecki Breitkopf, Carmen
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2020, 11 (04) : 433 - 443
  • [45] Return of individual research results and incidental findings in the clinical trials cooperative group setting
    Ferriere, Michael
    Van Ness, Brian
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) : 411 - 416
  • [46] A survey of aortic disease biorepository participants' preferences for return of research genetic results
    Love-Nichols, Jamie
    Uhlmann, Wendy R.
    Arscott, Patricia
    Willer, Cristen
    Hornsby, Whitney
    Roberts, J. Scott
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (03) : 645 - 655
  • [47] Ethical and Policy Considerations for Genomic Testing in Peaiatric Research: The Path Toward Disclosing Individual Research Results
    Wong, Craig S.
    Kogon, Amy J.
    Warady, Bradley A.
    Furth, Susan L.
    Lantos, John D.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 73 (06) : 837 - 845
  • [48] Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants
    Kostick, Kristin M.
    Brannan, Cody
    Pereira, Stacey
    Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2019, 180 (08) : 589 - 600
  • [49] Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices In Between
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Amendola, Laura M.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Brothers, Kyle
    Clayton, Ellen W.
    Chung, Wendy
    Evans, Barbara J.
    Evans, James P.
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Gallego, Carlos J.
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    Gray, Stacy W.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Kullo, Iftikhar J.
    Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
    McCarty, Cathy
    Prows, Cynthia A.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Salama, Joseph
    Sanderson, Saskia
    Van Driest, Sara L.
    Williams, Marc S.
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Wolf, Wendy A.
    Burke, Wylie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2014, 94 (06) : 818 - 826
  • [50] My Research Results: a program to facilitate return of clinically actionable genomic research findings
    Willis, Amanda M.
    Terrill, Bronwyn
    Pearce, Angela
    McEwen, Alison
    Ballinger, Mandy L.
    Young, Mary-Anne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (03) : 363 - 366