Adolescent perspectives on the return of individual results in genomic addiction research

被引:7
作者
Coors, Marilyn E. [1 ]
Raymond, Kristen M. [2 ]
McWilliams, Shannon K. [2 ]
Hopfer, Christian J. [2 ]
Mikulich-Gilbertson, Susan K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Dept Psychiat, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychiat, Div Subst Dependence, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
adolescents; biobank; genomic addiction research; incidental results; re-contact; return of individual research results; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; GENETIC RESEARCH; PARTICIPANTS; PARENTS; ATTITUDES; CHILDREN; COHORT; RECOMMENDATIONS; EXPECTATIONS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1097/YPG.0000000000000083
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This study surveyed all adolescents who were enrolled in behavioral genomic research and provided DNA to a biobank, including 320 patients undergoing treatment for substance and conduct problems (SCPs) and 109 non-SCP controls. Participants selected from three options on the return of individual genomic results (RIR) and rated eight methods of re-contact. Most individuals with SCPs (77.8%) and non-SCP controls (72.5%) wanted RIR involving health or behavioral implications. The majority of individuals with SCPs (67.2%) and non-SCP controls (69.7%) indicated that phone re-contact was 'best', with e-mail (22.5% SCPs, 33.9% non-SCPs) and social networking websites (21.3% SCPs, 20.2% non-SCPs) being viable options. These results suggest a layered approach for RIR: phone calls, followed by e-mails and a secure message to a social networking account. Data from this special and vulnerable population, which includes youth involved in the criminal justice system and substantial minority participation, bring an essential and missing perspective to the discussion of RIR. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 130
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research
    Dressler, Lynn G.
    Smolek, Sondra
    Ponsaran, Roselle
    Markey, Janell M.
    Starks, Helene
    Gerson, Nancy
    Lewis, Susan
    Press, Nancy
    Juengst, Eric
    Wiesner, Georgia L.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (02) : 215 - 222
  • [2] Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results
    Avard, Denise
    Senecal, Karine
    Madadi, Parvaz
    Sinnett, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2011, 39 (04) : 593 - 604
  • [3] Return of individual results in epilepsy genomic research: A view from the field
    Ottman, Ruth
    Freyer, Catharine
    Mefford, Heather C.
    Poduri, Annapurna
    Lowenstein, Daniel H.
    EPILEPSIA, 2018, 59 (09) : 1635 - 1642
  • [4] Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives
    Vears, Danya F.
    Minion, Joel T.
    Roberts, Stephanie J.
    Cummings, James
    Machirori, Mavis
    Blell, Mwenza
    Budin-Ljosne, Isabelle
    Cowley, Lorraine
    Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
    Gaff, Clara
    Green, Robert
    Hall, Alison
    Johns, Amber L.
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Mulrine, Stephanie
    Patch, Christine
    Winkler, Eva
    Murtagh, Madeleine J.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [5] The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results
    Bacon, Phoebe L.
    Harris, Erin D.
    Ziniel, Sonja I.
    Savage, Sarah K.
    Weitzman, Elissa R.
    Green, Robert C.
    Huntington, Noelle L.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2015, 10 (02) : 107 - 120
  • [6] The return of individual genomic results to research participants: design and pilot study of Tohoku Medical Megabank Project
    Kawame, Hiroshi
    Fukushima, Akimune
    Fuse, Nobuo
    Nagami, Fuji
    Suzuki, Yoichi
    Sakurai-Yageta, Mika
    Yasuda, Jun
    Yamaguchi-Kabata, Yumi
    Kinoshita, Kengo
    Ogishima, Soichi
    Takai, Takako
    Kuriyama, Shinichi
    Hozawa, Atsushi
    Nakaya, Naoki
    Nakamura, Tomohiro
    Minegishi, Naoko
    Sugawara, Junichi
    Suzuki, Kichiya
    Tomita, Hiroaki
    Uruno, Akira
    Kobayashi, Tomoko
    Aizawa, Yayoi
    Tokutomi, Tomoharu
    Yamamoto, Kayono
    Ohneda, Kinuko
    Kure, Shigeo
    Aoki, Yoko
    Katagiri, Hideki
    Ishigaki, Yasushi
    Sawada, Shojiro
    Sasaki, Makoto
    Yamamoto, Masayuki
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 67 (01) : 9 - 17
  • [7] International normative perspectives on the return of individual research results and incidental findings in genomic biobanks
    Zawati, Ma'n H.
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) : 484 - 489
  • [8] Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants?
    Pereira, Stacey
    Robinson, Jill Oliver
    McGuire, Amy L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (11) : 1524 - 1529
  • [9] Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
    Thorogood, Adrian
    Dalpe, Gratien
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 (04) : 535 - 546
  • [10] Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Iles, Brittany R.
    Ziniel, Sonja I.
    Bacon, Phoebe L.
    Savage, Sarah K.
    Christensen, Kurt D.
    Weitzman, Elissa R.
    Green, Robert C.
    Huntington, Noelle L.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2015, 10 (04) : 414 - 426