Development and Initial Validation of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index 50

被引:48
|
作者
Touma, Zahi [2 ]
Gladman, Dafna D. [2 ]
Ibanez, Dominique [2 ]
Urowitz, Murray B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Lupus Clin, Ctr Prognosis Studies Rheumat Dis, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Ctr Prognosis Studies Rheumat Dis, Lupus Clin, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS DISEASE ACTIVITY; INDEX; 2000; SLEDAI-2K; SRI-50; RESPONDER INDEX; DISEASE ACTIVITY; SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS; OUTCOME MEASURES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY; SLEDAI;
D O I
10.3899/jrheum.100724
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To describe the development and validation of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Responder Index 50 (SRI-50), an index to measure improvement in disease manifestations on followup visits. Methods. We proposed 50% improvement of SLEDAI-2K scores as this was felt by clinicians to reflect a clinically important improvement. We determined the best definitions of 50% improvement in each of the SLEDAI-2K descriptors. The SRI-50 data retrieval form was developed to standardize the documentation of the descriptors. The new assigned scores for the descriptors of SRI-50 were derived by dividing the score of SLEDAI-2K by 2. To evaluate the construct validity of SRI-50, all patients attending the Lupus Clinic from September 2009 to December 2009 were studied. Patients were assessed initially and on a followup visit according to both SLEDAI-2K and SRI-50 along with physician response assessment on a Likert scale (LS), which was considered the external construct. Results. SRI-SO is a 2-page document comprising 24 descriptors. The scoring method is simple, intuitive, and cumulative, and can be derived during the patient visit. Of the 298 patients enrolled in this study, 141 had a followup visit and were studied further. SRI-50 scores decreased more in patients with LS >= 50% compared to LS < 50% with a decrease of > 3. The decrease in SRI-50 scores was statistically and clinically more significant than the decrease in SLEDAI-2K scores. SRI-SO detected incomplete improvement, which would not have been discerned using SLEDAI-2K. Conclusion. SRI-50 has construct validity and is able to demonstrate incomplete, but clinically significant, improvement in disease activity between visits in patients with lupus. (First Release Dec 1 2010; J Rheumatol 2011;38:275-84; doi:10.3899/jrheum.100724)
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development validation and reliability of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50
    Z Touma
    DD Gladman
    MB Urowitz
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 14 (Suppl 3):
  • [2] Development validation and reliability of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50
    Touma, Z.
    Gladman, D. D.
    Urowitz, M. B.
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2012, 14
  • [3] Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50 Website
    Touma, Zabi
    Urowitz, Murray B.
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (05) : 733 - 734
  • [4] Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50 Website Reply
    Isenberg, David A.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (05) : 734 - 734
  • [5] Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50: A Reliable Index for Measuring Improvement in Disease Activity
    Touma, Zahi
    Urowitz, Murray B.
    Fortin, Paul R.
    Landolt, Carolina
    Toloza, Sergio M.
    Riddell, Claire
    Chandran, Vinod
    Eder, Lihi
    Ghanem, Aqeel
    Ziouzina, Olga
    Taghavi-Zadeh, Shahrzad
    Ibanez, Dominique
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2011, 38 (05) : 868 - 873
  • [6] Development and Assessment of Users' Satisfaction with the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50 Website
    Touma, Zahi
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    MacKinnon, Anne
    Carette, Simon
    Abu-Shakra, Mahmoud
    Askanase, Anca
    Nived, Ola
    Hanly, John G.
    Landolt-Marticorena, Carolina
    Tam, Lai-Shan
    Toloza, Sergio
    Nikpour, Mandana
    Riddell, Claire
    Stelman, Amanda
    Eder, Lihi
    Haddad, Amir
    Barber, Claire
    Urowitz, Murray B.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [7] Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index 50: sensitivity to response at 6 and 12 months
    Touma, Zahi
    Urowitz, Murray B.
    Taghavi-Zadeh, Shahrzad
    Ibanez, Dominique
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (10) : 1814 - 1819
  • [8] Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 Responder Index-50 Enhances the Ability of SLE Responder Index to Identify Responders in Clinical Trials
    Touma, Zahi
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    Ibanez, Dominique
    Taghavi-Zadeh, Shahrzad
    Urowitz, Murray B.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2011, 38 (11) : 2395 - 2399
  • [9] Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000
    Gladman, DD
    Ibañez, D
    Urowitz, MB
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 29 (02) : 288 - 291
  • [10] Usefulness in daily practice of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scale and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score index for assessing the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus
    Suszek, Dorota
    Dubaj, Maciej
    Bigosinski, Karol
    Dembowska, Aleksandra
    Kaniewski, Marcin
    Sielwanowska, Wiktoria
    Skierkowski, Bartosz
    Dzikowska, Izabela
    Sieczka, Julia
    Majdan, Maria
    REUMATOLOGIA, 2024, 62 (03): : 187 - 195