Measuring Meritocracy in the Public Sector in Europe: a New National and Sub-National Indicator

被引:17
作者
Charron, Nicholas [1 ]
Dahlstrom, Carl [1 ]
Lapuente, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Qual Govt Inst, Dept Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Bureaucracy; Corruption; Europe; Meritocracy; Sub national; GOVERNANCE; BUREAUCRACY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10610-016-9307-0
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Since the late nineteenth century, the presence of an independent and meritocratic bureaucracy has been posited as an advantage for effective bureaucratic behaviour and a means of limiting patrimonial networks and corruption, among other benefits. There is little consensus on how the features of an independent and meritocratic bureaucracy should be measured across countries, however, and broad empirical studies are therefore rare. What is more, the few such studies that exist have advanced measures which are constructed exclusively on expert surveys. Although these have indeed contributed to the knowledge in the field, the data on which they are built come with problems. This paper proposes a set of novel measures that complement existing measures and thus fill important gaps in this burgeoning literature. The measures we present are not based on expert assessments but on perceptions of public sector employees' and citizens'. We create two measures-that can be combined into one-from a recent survey (2013) of over 85,000 citizens in 24 European countries. One is purely based on the assessments from public sector employees' and the other is based on perceptions of citizens working outside the public sector. The paper also discusses the survey and explores the external validity of the measures provided here, showing correlations with alternative measures based on expert opinions, as well as variables from the literature that we would expect to correlate highly with a meritocratic bureaucracy.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 523
页数:25
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research [J].
Adcock, R ;
Collier, D .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) :529-546
[2]   Formal and real authority in organizations [J].
Aghion, P ;
Tirole, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1997, 105 (01) :1-29
[3]   Bureaucrats or politicians? Part I: A single policy task [J].
Alesina, Alberto ;
Tabellini, Guido .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (01) :169-179
[4]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC SERVICES ARE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, QUALITY GOVT CORRUPT, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226729589.001.0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, QOG WORK PAP SER
[8]  
Charron N, 2013, QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT AND CORRUPTION FROM A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GOOD GOVERNMENT IN EU REGIONS, P1, DOI 10.4337/9780857936943
[9]   O Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions [J].
Charron, Nicholas ;
Dijkstra, Lewis ;
Lapuente, Victor .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2015, 122 (02) :315-346
[10]   Regional Governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States [J].
Charron, Nicholas ;
Dijkstra, Lewis ;
Lapuente, Victor .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2014, 48 (01) :68-90