Sustainable corporate governance for environmental innovation: A configurational analysis on board capital, CEO power and ownership structure

被引:35
作者
Shui, Xiaolong [1 ]
Zhang, Minhao [1 ]
Smart, Palie [1 ]
Ye, Fei [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Management, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental innovation; CEO power; Board capital; Ownership; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; AGENCY; DIVERSITY; ORIENTATION; DIMENSIONS; DIRECTORS; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
CEOs, boards of directors, and owners are believed to be important actors in affecting environmental innovation. Yet, there is a lack of combined view on the three actors in the literature. This study aims to explore the sources of environmental innovation from the perspective of corporate governance bundles. Considering the interdependent nature of the three, this study proposes a configurational model consisting of CEO (formal and informal) power, board capital (breadth and depth), and ownership (institutional and insider). We undertake a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) on a sample of 250 dirty firms and discover six sufficient configurations for high environmental innovation. These configurations suggest that there are multiple paths for achieving high environmental innovation. Furthermore, both powerful and weak CEOs can be environmental innovation facilitators if they are accompanied by suitable board archetypes and ownership structure.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 794
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Innovation and Institutional Ownership
    Aghion, Philippe
    Van Reenen, John
    Zingales, Luigi
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) : 277 - 304
  • [2] An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities
    Aguilera, Ruth V.
    Filatotchev, Igor
    Gospel, Howard
    Jackson, Gregory
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (03) : 475 - 492
  • [3] Big Egos Can Be Green: A Study of CEO Hubris and Environmental Innovation
    Arena, Claudia
    Michelon, Giovanna
    Trojanowski, Grzegorz
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (02) : 316 - 336
  • [4] Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using fsQCA
    Beynon, Malcolm J.
    Jones, Paul
    Pickernell, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 115 : 443 - 455
  • [5] Coopetitive innovation alliance performance: Alliance competence, alliance's market orientation, and relational governance
    Bicen, Pelin
    Hunt, Shelby D.
    Madhavaram, Sreedhar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 123 : 23 - 31
  • [6] Blau P.M., 1977, INEQUALITY HETEROGEN
  • [7] The Effect of Family Ownership on Different Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Large US Firms
    Block, Joern H.
    Wagner, Marcus
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (07) : 475 - 492
  • [8] Inventor Chief Executive Officers and Firm Innovation
    Bostan, Ibrahim
    Mian, G. Mujtaba
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2019, 19 (02) : 247 - 286
  • [9] Boyd BK, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P1892, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-6486.2010.00943.X
  • [10] Configurational conditions and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A fsQCA approach
    Cao, Dongmei
    Wang, Yichuan
    Berkeley, Nigel
    Tjahjono, Benny
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2022, 55 (04)