Distribution-Free Mediation Analysis for Nonlinear Models with Confounding

被引:24
作者
Albert, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44120 USA
关键词
MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; POTENTIAL OUTCOMES; CAUSAL;
D O I
10.1097/EDE.0b013e31826c2bb9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Recently, researchers have used a potential-outcome framework to estimate causally interpretable direct and indirect effects of an intervention or exposure on an outcome. One approach to causal-mediation analysis uses the so-called mediation formula to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects. This approach generalizes the classical mediation estimators and allows for arbitrary distributions for the outcome variable and mediator. A limitation of the standard (parametric) mediation formula approach is that it requires a specified mediator regression model and distribution; such a model may be difficult to construct and may not be of primary interest. To address this limitation, we propose a new method for causal-mediation analysis that uses the empirical distribution function, thereby avoiding parametric distribution assumptions for the mediator. To adjust for confounders of the exposure-mediator and exposure-outcome relationships, inverse-probability weighting is incorporated based on a supplementary model of the probability of exposure. This method, which yields the estimates of the natural direct and indirect effects for a specified reference group, is applied to data from a cohort study of dental caries in very-low-birth-weight adolescents to investigate the oral-hygiene index as a possible mediator. Simulation studies show low bias in the estimation of direct and indirect effects in a variety of distribution scenarios, whereas the standard mediation formula approach can be considerably biased when the distribution of the mediator is incorrectly specified.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 888
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models [J].
Albert, Jeffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (08) :1282-1304
[2]   Generalized Causal Mediation Analysis [J].
Albert, Jeffrey M. ;
Nelson, Suchitra .
BIOMETRICS, 2011, 67 (03) :1028-1038
[3]   A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) :734-753
[4]  
Avin C, 2005, 19TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-05), P357
[5]   Statistical assessment of mediational effects for logistic mediational models [J].
Bin, H ;
Sivaganesan, S ;
Succop, P ;
Goodman, E .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (17) :2713-2728
[6]   Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects [J].
Crump, Richard K. ;
Hotz, V. Joseph ;
Imbens, Guido W. ;
Mitnik, Oscar A. .
BIOMETRIKA, 2009, 96 (01) :187-199
[7]  
DiCiccio TJ, 1996, STAT SCI, V11, P189
[8]   Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects [J].
Imai, Kosuke ;
Keele, Luke ;
Yamamoto, Teppei .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (01) :51-71
[9]   A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects [J].
MacKinnon, DP ;
Lockwood, CM ;
Hoffman, JM ;
West, SG ;
Sheets, V .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (01) :83-104
[10]   Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies [J].
McCaffrey, DF ;
Ridgeway, G ;
Morral, AR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 9 (04) :403-425