Cystatin C-based equations in renal transplantation: Moving toward a better glomerular filtration rate prediction?

被引:39
作者
Maillard, Nicolas [1 ]
Mariat, Christophe [1 ]
Bonneau, Christine [2 ]
Mehdi, Manolie [1 ]
Thibaudin, Lise [1 ]
Laporte, Silvy [3 ]
Alamartine, Eric [1 ]
Chamson, Annette [2 ]
Berthoux, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Labs Explorat Fonctionnelles Renales, Serv Nephrol Dialyse & Transplantat Renale, St Etienne, France
[2] Univ St Etienne, CHU St Etienne, Hop NORD, EA 3065,Lab Biochim, St Etienne, France
[3] Univ St Etienne, CHU St Etienne, Hop NORD, EA 3065,Lab Pharmacol Clin, St Etienne, France
关键词
graft function; GFR; cystatin C; renal transplantation;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181744225
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimators perform poorly in renal transplant recipients. Cystatin C might be a better alternative to serum creatinine in assessing renal graft function. We compared several cystatin C-based equations with the modification diet renal disease (MDRD) equation in 120 adult renal transplant recipients for whom the GFR was measured by the gold standard inulin clearance. Mean inulin-measured GFR was 52.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (range, 13-119). The Hoek, Rule, Le Bricon, and Filler cystatin C-based formulas showed significantly better performances (accuracy 30% of 82%, 81%, 78%, and 71%), than the MDRD equation (58%, Mac Nemar test, P<0.01). Sensitivity to detect a GFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was significantly higher for the Hoek and the Rule equations (0.95, 95% CI 0.91-1) than for the MDRD equation (0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.85). These data confirm that cystatin C as a GFR marker offers significant advantages over creatinine in renal transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:1855 / 1858
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Delanaye P, 2006, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V21, P1130, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfl038
[2]   Cystatin C as a marker of GFR -: history, indications, and future research [J].
Filler, G ;
Bökenkamp, A ;
Hofmann, W ;
Le Bricon, T ;
Martínez-Brú, C ;
Grubb, A .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 38 (01) :1-8
[3]   Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? [J].
Filler, G ;
Lepage, N .
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 18 (10) :981-985
[4]   Performance of different prediction equations for estimating renal function in kidney transplantation [J].
Gaspari, F ;
Ferrari, S ;
Stucchi, N ;
Centemeri, E ;
Carrara, F ;
Pellegrino, M ;
Gherardi, G ;
Gotti, E ;
Segoloni, G ;
Salvadori, M ;
Rigotti, P ;
Valente, U ;
Donati, D ;
Sandrini, S ;
Sparacino, V ;
Remuzzi, G ;
Perico, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) :1826-1835
[5]   A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate [J].
Hoek, FJ ;
Kemperman, FAW ;
Krediet, RT .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 18 (10) :2024-2031
[6]  
KLASSEN DK, 1992, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V3, P108
[7]   Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL/min from plasma cystatin C values in mg/L [J].
Larsson, A ;
Malm, J ;
Grubb, A ;
Hansson, LO .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2004, 64 (01) :25-30
[8]  
Le Bricon T, 2000, CLIN CHEM, V46, P1206
[9]   Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate [J].
Levey, Andrew S. ;
Coresh, Josef ;
Greene, Tom ;
Stevens, Lesley A. ;
Lucy Zhang, Yaping ;
Hendriksen, Stephen ;
Kusek, John W. ;
Van Lente, Frederick .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (04) :247-254
[10]   Serum cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate [J].
Madero, Magdalena ;
Sarnak, Mark J. ;
Stevens, Lesley A. .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2006, 15 (06) :610-616