Evaluation on uncertainty sources in projecting hydrological changes over the Xijiang River basin in South China

被引:28
作者
Yuan, Fei [1 ]
Zhao, Chongxu [1 ]
Jiang, Yong [2 ]
Ren, Liliang [1 ]
Shan, Hongcui [3 ]
Zhang, Limin [1 ]
Zhu, Yonghua [1 ]
Chen, Tao [1 ]
Jiang, Shanhu [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoli [1 ]
Shen, Hongren [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, 1 Xikang Rd, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Water Resources Serv Ctr Jiangsu Prov, 5 Shanghai Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Water Resources & Hydropower Res Inst, 370 North Shaoshan Rd, Changsha 410007, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty; Climate change; Emission scenario; Climate model; Statistical downscaling method; Hydrological model; Extreme flow frequency analysis; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; FLOOD FREQUENCY; QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY; GLOBAL CLIMATE; ZHUJIANG RIVER; RUNOFF MODEL; PRECIPITATION; CATCHMENT; SCENARIOS; ENSEMBLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.034
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Projections of hydrological changes are associated with large uncertainties from different sources, which should be quantified for an effective implementation of water management policies adaptive to future climate change. In this study, a modeling chain framework to project future hydrological changes and the associated uncertainties in the Xijiang River basin, South China, was established. The framework consists of three emission scenarios (ESs), four climate models (CMS), four statistical downscaling (SD) methods, four hydrological modeling (HM) schemes, and four probability distributions (PDs) for extreme flow frequency analyses. Direct variance method was adopted to analyze the manner by which uncertainty sources such as ES, CM, SD, and HM affect the estimates of future evapotranspiration (ET) and streamflow, and to quantify the uncertainties of PDs in future flood and drought risk assessment. Results show that ES is one of the least important uncertainty sources in most situations. CM, in general, is the dominant uncertainty source for the projections of monthly ET and monthly streamflow during most of the annual cycle, daily streamflow below the 99.6% quantile level, and extreme low flow. SD is the most predominant uncertainty source in the projections of extreme high flow, and has a considerable percentage of uncertainty contribution in monthly streamflow projections in July-September. The effects of SD in other cases are negligible. HM is a non-ignorable uncertainty source that has the potential to produce much larger uncertainties for the projections of low flow and ET in warm and wet seasons than for the projections of high flow. PD contributes a larger percentage of uncertainty in extreme flood projections than it does in extreme low flow estimates. Despite the large uncertainties in hydrological projections, this work found that future extreme low flow would undergo a considerable reduction, and a noticeable increase in drought risk in the Xijiang River basin would be expected. Thus, the necessity of employing effective water-saving techniques and adaptive water resources management strategies for drought disaster mitigation should be addressed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 450
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Framework to Quantify the Uncertainty Contribution of GCMs Over Multiple Sources in Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change
    Wang, Hui-Min
    Chen, Jie
    Xu, Chong-Yu
    Zhang, Jianke
    Chen, Hua
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2020, 8 (08)
  • [42] How is the risk of hydrological drought in the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China?
    Yang, Peng
    Xia, Jun
    Zhang, Yongyong
    Zhan, Chesheng
    Sun, Shangxin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 693
  • [43] Impact of climate change on hydrological extremes in the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Gu, Huanghe
    Yu, Zhongbo
    Wang, Guiling
    Wang, Jigan
    Ju, Qin
    Yang, Chuanguo
    Fan, Chuanhao
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 29 (03) : 693 - 707
  • [44] Future changes in precipitation and temperature over the Yangtze River Basin in China based on CMIP6 GCMs
    Yue, Yanlin
    Yan, Dan
    Yue, Qun
    Ji, Guangxing
    Wang, Zheng
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2021, 264
  • [45] Observing Multisphere Hydrological Changes in the Largest River Basin of the Tibetan Plateau
    Wang, Lei
    Cuo, Lan
    Luo, Dongliang
    Su, Fengge
    Ye, Qinghua
    Yao, Tandong
    Zhou, Jing
    Li, Xiuping
    Li, Ning
    Sun, He
    Liu, Lei
    Wang, Yuanwei
    Zeng, Tian
    Hu, Zhidan
    Liu, Ruishun
    Chai, Chenhao
    Wang, Guangpeng
    Guo, Xiaoyang Zhon Xiaoyu
    Zhao, Haoqiang
    Zhao, Huabiao
    Yang, Wei
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 103 (06) : E1595 - E1620
  • [46] Changes in river systems and relevant hydrological responses in the Yangtze River Delta, China
    Lin, Zhixin
    Xu, Youpeng
    Luo, Shuang
    Wang, Qiang
    Yu, Zhihui
    ANTHROPOCENE COASTS, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [47] Copula-based risk evaluation of hydrological droughts in the East River basin, China
    Zhang, Qiang
    Xiao, Mingzhong
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Chen, Xiaohong
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2013, 27 (06) : 1397 - 1406
  • [48] Projecting Spatial Patterns of Flood Hazard: Recent Climate and Future Changes over Yangtze River Basin
    He Shanfeng1
    2. Henan Polytechnic University
    3. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2010, (03) : 83 - 88
  • [49] Projecting Spatial Patterns of Flood Hazard: Recent Climate and Future Changes over Yangtze River Basin
    He Shanfeng
    Ge Quansheng
    Wu Shaohong
    Dai Erfu
    Shi Chunjian
    Li Mingqi
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 8 (03) : 83 - 88
  • [50] Does comprehensive evaluation of hydrological models influence projected changes of mean and high flows in the Godavari River basin?
    Mishra, Vimal
    Shah, Harsh
    Lopez, M. Rocio Rivas
    Lobanova, Anastasia
    Krysanova, Valentina
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1187 - 1205