Evaluation on uncertainty sources in projecting hydrological changes over the Xijiang River basin in South China

被引:28
|
作者
Yuan, Fei [1 ]
Zhao, Chongxu [1 ]
Jiang, Yong [2 ]
Ren, Liliang [1 ]
Shan, Hongcui [3 ]
Zhang, Limin [1 ]
Zhu, Yonghua [1 ]
Chen, Tao [1 ]
Jiang, Shanhu [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoli [1 ]
Shen, Hongren [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, 1 Xikang Rd, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Water Resources Serv Ctr Jiangsu Prov, 5 Shanghai Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Water Resources & Hydropower Res Inst, 370 North Shaoshan Rd, Changsha 410007, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty; Climate change; Emission scenario; Climate model; Statistical downscaling method; Hydrological model; Extreme flow frequency analysis; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; FLOOD FREQUENCY; QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY; GLOBAL CLIMATE; ZHUJIANG RIVER; RUNOFF MODEL; PRECIPITATION; CATCHMENT; SCENARIOS; ENSEMBLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.034
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Projections of hydrological changes are associated with large uncertainties from different sources, which should be quantified for an effective implementation of water management policies adaptive to future climate change. In this study, a modeling chain framework to project future hydrological changes and the associated uncertainties in the Xijiang River basin, South China, was established. The framework consists of three emission scenarios (ESs), four climate models (CMS), four statistical downscaling (SD) methods, four hydrological modeling (HM) schemes, and four probability distributions (PDs) for extreme flow frequency analyses. Direct variance method was adopted to analyze the manner by which uncertainty sources such as ES, CM, SD, and HM affect the estimates of future evapotranspiration (ET) and streamflow, and to quantify the uncertainties of PDs in future flood and drought risk assessment. Results show that ES is one of the least important uncertainty sources in most situations. CM, in general, is the dominant uncertainty source for the projections of monthly ET and monthly streamflow during most of the annual cycle, daily streamflow below the 99.6% quantile level, and extreme low flow. SD is the most predominant uncertainty source in the projections of extreme high flow, and has a considerable percentage of uncertainty contribution in monthly streamflow projections in July-September. The effects of SD in other cases are negligible. HM is a non-ignorable uncertainty source that has the potential to produce much larger uncertainties for the projections of low flow and ET in warm and wet seasons than for the projections of high flow. PD contributes a larger percentage of uncertainty in extreme flood projections than it does in extreme low flow estimates. Despite the large uncertainties in hydrological projections, this work found that future extreme low flow would undergo a considerable reduction, and a noticeable increase in drought risk in the Xijiang River basin would be expected. Thus, the necessity of employing effective water-saving techniques and adaptive water resources management strategies for drought disaster mitigation should be addressed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 450
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Copula-based comprehensive drought identification and evaluation over the Xijiang River Basin in South China
    Tian, Qingqing
    Wang, Fei
    Tian, Yu
    Jiang, Yunzhong
    Weng, Peiyao
    Li, Jinbei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [2] Hydrological Appraisal of Climate Change Impacts on the Water Resources of the Xijiang Basin, South China
    Zhu, Dehua
    Das, Samiran
    Ren, Qiwei
    WATER, 2017, 9 (10)
  • [3] Analysis of hydrological drought frequency for the Xijiang River Basin in South China using observed streamflow data
    Wu, Zhiyong
    Lin, Qingxia
    Lu, Guihua
    He, Hai
    Qu, John J.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 77 (03) : 1655 - 1677
  • [4] Impacts of increased CO2 on the hydrologic response over the Xijiang (West River) basin, South China
    Niu, Jun
    Sivakumar, Bellie
    Chen, Ji
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 505 : 218 - 227
  • [5] Projecting streamflow in the Tangwang River basin (China) using a rainfall generator and two hydrological models
    Liu, Wenbin
    Zhang, Aijing
    Wang, Lei
    Fu, Guobin
    Chen, Deliang
    Liu, Changming
    Cai, Tijiu
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2015, 62 (02) : 79 - 97
  • [6] Uncertainty evaluation of copula analysis of hydrological droughts in the East River basin, China
    Zhang, Qiang
    Xiao, Mingzhong
    Singh, Vijay P.
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2015, 129 : 1 - 9
  • [7] Moisture sources of precipitation over the Pearl River Basin in South China
    Liu, Xinxin
    Guo, Chengchao
    Zhang, Jingkun
    Liu, Yang
    Xiao, Mingzhong
    Wu, Yongyan
    Li, Bo
    Zhao, Tongtiegang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 44 (06) : 2160 - 2173
  • [8] Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments
    Addor, Nans
    Roessler, Ole
    Koeplin, Nina
    Huss, Matthias
    Weingartner, Rolf
    Seibert, Jan
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (10) : 7541 - 7562
  • [9] Temporal and Spatial Changes of Hydrological Processes in the Jinsha River Basin, China
    Zeng, Xiao-fan
    Ye, Lei
    Zhao, Na
    Mai, Zi-jun
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (SEEE 2016), 2016,
  • [10] Combined effects of predicted climate and land use changes on future hydrological droughts in the Luanhe River basin, China
    Chen, Xu
    Han, Ruiguang
    Feng, Ping
    Wang, Yongjie
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 110 (02) : 1305 - 1337