Identifying Women With Dense Breasts at High Risk for Interval Cancer A Cohort Study

被引:232
作者
Kerlikowske, Karla
Zhu, Weiwei
Tosteson, Anna N. A.
Sprague, Brian L.
Tice, Jeffrey A.
Lehman, Constance D.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[4] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
CARCINOMA IN-SITU; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; TOMOSYNTHESIS; PERFORMANCE; ULTRASOUND; OUTCOMES; VALIDATION; FILM; AGE;
D O I
10.7326/M14-1465
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Twenty-one states have laws requiring that women be notified if they have dense breasts and that they be advised to discuss supplemental imaging with their provider. Objective: To better direct discussions of supplemental imaging by determining which combinations of breast cancer risk and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories are associated with high interval cancer rates. Design: Prospective cohort. Setting: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) breast imaging facilities. Patients: 365 426 women aged 40 to 74 years who had 831 455 digital screening mammography examinations. Measurements: BI-RADS breast density, BCSC 5-year breast cancer risk, and interval cancer rate (invasive cancer <= 12 months after a normal mammography result) per 1000 mammography examinations. High interval cancer rate was defined as more than 1 case per 1000 examinations. Results: High interval cancer rates were observed for women with 5-year risk of 1.67% or greater and extremely dense breasts or 5-year risk of 2.50% or greater and heterogeneously dense breasts (24% of all women with dense breasts). The interval rate of advanced-stage disease was highest (> 0.4 case per 1000 examinations) among women with 5-year risk of 2.50% or greater and heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts (21% of all women with dense breasts). Five-year risk was low to average (0% to 1.66%) for 51.0% of women with heterogeneously dense breasts and 52.5% with extremely dense breasts, with interval cancer rates of 0.58 to 0.63 and 0.72 to 0.89 case per 1000 examinations, respectively. Limitation: The benefit of supplemental imaging was not assessed. Conclusion: Breast density should not be the sole criterion for deciding whether supplemental imaging is justified because not all women with dense breasts have high interval cancer rates. BCSC 5-year risk combined with BI-RADS breast density can identify women at high risk for interval cancer to inform patientprovider discussions about alternative screening strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MANUAL STAGING CANC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Breast imaging reporting and data system
[3]   Is mammographic density differentially associated with breast cancer according to receptor status? A meta-analysis [J].
Antoni, Sebastien ;
Sasco, Annie J. ;
Silva, Isabel dos Santos ;
McCormack, Valerie .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 137 (02) :337-347
[4]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[5]   Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Bohm-Velez, Marcela ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Evans, W. Phil ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Boparai, Karan .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18) :2151-2163
[6]   Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Boehm-Velez, Marcela ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Larsen, Linda H. ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Adams, Amanda ;
Yeh, Nolin M. ;
Gabrielli, Glenna .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13) :1394-1404
[7]   Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics [J].
Bertrand, Kimberly A. ;
Tamimi, Rulla M. ;
Scott, Christopher G. ;
Jensen, Matthew R. ;
Pankratz, V. Shane ;
Visscher, Daniel ;
Norman, Aaron ;
Couch, Fergus ;
Shepherd, John ;
Fan, Bo ;
Chen, Yunn-Yi ;
Ma, Lin ;
Beck, Andrew H. ;
Cummings, Steven R. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla ;
Vachon, Celine M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (06)
[8]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[9]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
[10]   Identifying Minimally Acceptable Interpretive Performance Criteria for Screening Mammography [J].
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Sickles, Edward A. ;
Monsees, Barbara S. ;
Bassett, Lawrence W. ;
Brenner, R. James ;
Feig, Stephen A. ;
Smith, Robert A. ;
Rosenberg, Robert D. ;
Bogart, T. Andrew ;
Browning, Sally ;
Barry, Jane W. ;
Kelly, Mary M. ;
Tran, Khai A. ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (02) :354-361