Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer

被引:108
作者
Park, Jeong-Yeol [1 ]
Kim, Eyu Nyong [1 ]
Kim, Dae-Yeon [1 ]
Suh, Dae-Shik [1 ]
Kim, Jong-Hyeok [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Man [1 ]
Kim, Young-Tak [1 ]
Nam, Joo-Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
uterine corpus cancer; PET/CT; MRI; preoperative evaluation; lymph node;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative detection of primary lesions and lymph node (LN) and distant metastases in patients with uterine corpus cancer. Methods. The patient cohort consisted of 53 women with uterine corpus cancer who underwent preoperative workup, including both MRI and PET/CT scans, and underwent surgical staging, including pelvic and/or paraaortic LN dissection, between October 2004 and June 2007 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Pathologic data from surgical staging were compared with the preoperative MRI and PET/CT results. For area specific analysis, LNs were divided into paraaortic, right pelvic and left pelvic areas. Results. In detecting primary lesions, MRI and PET/CT showed no differences in sensitivity (91.5% vs. 89.4%), specificity (33.3% vs. 50.5%), accuracy (84.9% vs. 84.9%), positive predictive value (PPV) (91.5% vs. 93.3%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (33.3% vs. 37.5%). With MRI, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for detecting metastatic LNs on LN area-by-area analysis were 46.2%, 87.9%, 83.9%, 28.6% and 94.0%, respectively; With PET/CT, those were 69.2%, 90.3%, 88.3%, 42.9%, and 96.6%, respectively. PET/CT showed higher sensitivity, but it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.250). There were also no differences in specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV. In detecting distant metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of PET/CT were 100%, 93.8%, 92.5%, 62.5% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion. In patients with uterine corpus cancer, PET/CT had moderate sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in detecting primary lesions and LN metastases, indicating that this method cannot replace surgical staging. The primary benefit of PET/CT is its sensitivity in detecting distant metastases. Because of its high NPV in predicting LN metastasis, PET/CT may also have advantages in selected patients who are poor candidates for surgical staging. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 492
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma
    Belhocine, T
    De Barsy, C
    Hustinx, R
    Willems-Foidart, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (09) : 1132 - 1139
  • [2] Powerful prognostic stratification by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy
    Cachin, Florent
    Prince, H. Miles
    Hogg, Annette
    Ware, Robert E.
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (19) : 3026 - 3031
  • [3] 18F-FDG PET in the management of endometrial cancer
    Chao, A
    Chang, TC
    Ng, KK
    Hsueh, S
    Huang, HJ
    Chou, HH
    Tsai, CS
    Yen, TC
    Wu, TI
    Lai, CH
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [4] Computed tomography in endometrial carcinoma
    Connor, JP
    Andrews, JI
    Anderson, B
    Buller, RE
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (05) : 692 - 696
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer
    Horowitz, NS
    Dehdashti, F
    Herzog, TJ
    Rader, JS
    Powell, MA
    Gibb, RK
    Grigsby, PW
    Siegel, BA
    Mutch, DG
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 95 (03) : 546 - 551
  • [6] MR-IMAGING EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA - RESULTS OF AN NCI COOPERATIVE STUDY
    HRICAK, H
    RUBINSTEIN, LV
    GHERMAN, GM
    KARSTAEDT, N
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (03) : 829 - 832
  • [7] *INT FED GYN OBST, 1989, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V28, P190
  • [8] Current concepts - Positron-emission tomography and assessment of cancer therapy
    Juweid, ME
    Cheson, BD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (05) : 496 - 507
  • [9] Positron emission tomography imaging for gynecologic malignancy
    Lai, Chyong-Huey
    Yen, Tzu-Chen
    Chang, Ting-Chang
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 19 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [10] Lerman H, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P266