The impact of audit firms' characteristics on audit fees following information security breaches

被引:45
作者
Yen, Ju-Chun [1 ]
Lim, Jee-Hae [2 ]
Wang, Tawei [3 ]
Hsu, Carol [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Grad Inst Accounting, 300 Zhongda Rd, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Shidler Coll Business, 2404 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Depaul Univ, Kellstadt Grad Sch Business, 1 East Jackson Blvd,DePaul Ctr 6028, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
[4] Tongji Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Tongji Bldg A,Siping Rd 1500, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Audit fees; Audit-firm industry expertise; Audit-firm tenure; Audit-firm size; Information security breach; INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION; MARKET REACTIONS; LITIGATION RISK; TOP-MANAGEMENT; TENURE; SYSTEMS; SIZE; EARNINGS; QUALITY; ANNOUNCEMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.10.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Given the importance of auditors' assessing business risks and evaluating internal controls, we investigate whether an audit firm's industry expertise, tenure, and size can help its auditors better understand external and internal threats faced by the client with less effort. Using reported information security breach incidents from 2004 to 2013, we find that, consistent with prior studies, audit fees are higher after the occurrence of an information security breach. However, such an association is negatively moderated when the audit firm has industry-specific expertise, longer experience with the client, and is one of the Big 4 firms. Our results suggest that because of their better knowledge about a specific industry, increased familiarity with the client's operations, and more resources to understand a client's vulnerabilities and/or information security policies and procedures, these auditors are more capable of assessing the potentially changing information security risks implied by the occurrence of information security breach incidents. Our results are robust to a variety of sensitivity checks.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 507
页数:19
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Acquisti A., 2006, P INT C INFORM SYSTE
[2]  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2006, UND ENT ITS ENV ASS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, DOI [10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2003.09.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2003.09.001]
[4]   Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities [J].
Armstrong, Christopher S. ;
Jagolinzer, Alan D. ;
Larcker, David F. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (02) :225-271
[5]   Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality [J].
Balsam, S ;
Krishnan, J ;
Yang, JS .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2003, 22 (02) :71-97
[6]  
BCBS, 2001, OP RISK SUPP DOC NEW
[8]  
Bell TB, 1998, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V17, P13
[9]   A content analysis of auditors' reports on IT internal control weaknesses: The comparative advantages of an automated approach to control weakness identification [J].
Boritz, J. Efrim ;
Hayes, Louise ;
Lim, Jee-Hae .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 14 (02) :138-163
[10]  
Campbell K., 2003, Journal of Computer Security, V11, P431