Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition

被引:624
作者
Rowcliffe, J. Marcus [1 ]
Field, Juliet [2 ]
Turvey, Samuel T. [1 ]
Carbone, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Zool Soc London, Inst Zool, London NW1 4RY, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Fac Biol Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
abundance estimation; animal movement; camera traps; day range; density estimation; detection probability; trapping rate;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Density estimation is of fundamental importance in wildlife management. The use of camera traps to estimate animal density has so far been restricted to capture-recapture analysis of species with individually identifiable markings. This study developed a method that eliminates the requirement for individual recognition of animals by modelling the underlying process of contact between animals and cameras. 2. The model provides a factor that linearly scales trapping rate with density, depending on two key biological variables (average animal group size and day range) and two characteristics of the camera sensor (distance and angle within which it detects animals). 3. We tested the approach in an enclosed animal park with known abundances of four species, obtaining accurate estimates in three out of four cases. Inaccuracy in the fourth species was because of biased placement of cameras with respect to the distribution of this species. 4. Synthesis and applications. Subject to unbiased camera placement and accurate measurement of model parameters, this method opens the possibility of reduced labour costs for estimating wildlife density and may make estimation possible where it has not been previously. We provide guidelines on the trapping effort required to obtain reasonably precise estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:1228 / 1236
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, ESTIMATION ANIMAL AB
[2]  
BORCHERS DL, 2007, BIOMETRICS
[3]   How far do animals go? Determinants of day range in mammals [J].
Carbone, C ;
Cowlishaw, G ;
Isaac, NJB ;
Rowcliffe, JM .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2005, 165 (02) :290-297
[4]   The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals [J].
Carbone, C ;
Christie, S ;
Conforti, K ;
Coulson, T ;
Franklin, N ;
Ginsberg, JR ;
Griffiths, M ;
Holden, J ;
Kawanishi, K ;
Kinnaird, M ;
Laidlaw, R ;
Lynam, A ;
Macdonald, DW ;
Martyr, D ;
McDougal, C ;
Nath, L ;
O'Brien, T ;
Seidensticker, J ;
Smith, DJL ;
Sunquist, M ;
Tilson, R ;
Shahruddin, WNW .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 4 :75-79
[5]   A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density [J].
Carbone, C ;
Gittleman, JL .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5563) :2273-2276
[6]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP MONO, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[7]   Body size, diet and population density in afrotropical forest mammals: A comparison with neotropical species [J].
Fa, JE ;
Purvis, A .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1997, 66 (01) :98-112
[8]  
Henschel P, 2003, LEOPARDS AFRICAN RAI
[9]   Use, misuse and extensions of "ideal gas" models of animal encounter [J].
Hutchinson, John M. C. ;
Waser, Peter M. .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2007, 82 (03) :335-359
[10]   The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals: a comment on misleading conclusions [J].
Jennelle, CS ;
Runge, MC ;
MacKenzie, DI .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 5 :119-120