mSRFR: a machine learning model using microalgal signature features for ncRNA classification

被引:7
作者
Anuntakarun, Songtham [1 ,2 ]
Lertampaiporn, Supatcha [3 ]
Laomettachit, Teeraphan [1 ]
Wattanapornprom, Warin [4 ]
Ruengjitchatchawalya, Marasri [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi KMUTT, Bioinformat & Syst Biol Program, Sch Bioresources & Technol, Bangkok 10150, Thailand
[2] KMUTT, Sch Informat Technol, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[3] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Natl Sci & Technol Dev Agcy, Natl Ctr Genet Engn & Biotechnol BIOTEC, Biochem Engn & Syst Biol Res Grp, Bangkok 10150, Thailand
[4] KMUTT, Fac Sci, Dept Math, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[5] KMUTT, Biotechnol Program, Sch Bioresources & Technol, Bangkok 10150, Thailand
[6] KMUTT, Algal Biotechnol Res Grp, Pilot Plant Dev & Training Inst PDTI, Bangkok 10150, Thailand
关键词
Microalgae; Machine learning; Non-coding RNAs; Random Forest; Signature feature; SMOTE; NONCODING RNAS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1186/s13040-022-00291-0
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This work presents mSRFR (microalgae SMOTE Random Forest Relief model), a classification tool for noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in microalgae, including green algae, diatoms, golden algae, and cyanobacteria. First, the SMOTE technique was applied to address the challenge of imbalanced data due to the different numbers of microalgae ncRNAs from different species in the EBI RNA-central database. Then the top 20 significant features from a total of 106 features, including sequence-based, secondary structure, base-pair, and triplet sequence-structure features, were selected using the Relief feature selection method. Next, ten-fold cross-validation was applied to choose a classifier algorithm with the highest performance among Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, K-nearest Neighbor, and Neural Network, based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area. The results showed that the Random Forest classifier achieved the highest ROC area of 0.992. Then, the Random Forest algorithm was selected and compared with other tools, including RNAcon, CPC, CPC2, CNCI, and CPPred. Our model achieved a high accuracy of about 97% and a low false-positive rate of about 2% in predicting the test dataset of microalgae. Furthermore, the top features from Relief revealed that the %GA dinucleotide is a signature feature of microalgal ncRNAs when compared to Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Homo sapiens.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Trees vs Neurons: Comparison between random forest and ANN for high-resolution prediction of building energy consumption [J].
Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem ;
Mourshed, Monjur ;
Rezgui, Yacine .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 147 :77-89
[2]  
Bao Michael, 2012, Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics, V10, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.gpb.2012.05.004
[3]   NON-CODING RNAs IN DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE: BACKGROUND, MECHANISMS, AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES [J].
Beermann, Julia ;
Piccoli, Maria-Teresa ;
Viereck, Janika ;
Thum, Thomas .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2016, 96 (04) :1297-1325
[4]  
Delhi N, 2013, FUNCTIONAL INGREDIEN
[5]   Redfield revisited:: variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis [J].
Geider, RJ ;
La Roche, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 2002, 37 (01) :1-17
[6]  
Hall M., 2009, SIGKDD EXPLORATIONS, V11, P10, DOI [10.1145/1656274.1656278, DOI 10.1145/1656274.1656278]
[7]   ALGAE OF TERRESTRIAL HABITATS [J].
HOFFMANN, L .
BOTANICAL REVIEW, 1989, 55 (02) :77-105
[8]   VERY SIMPLE CLASSIFICATION RULES PERFORM WELL ON MOST COMMONLY USED DATASETS [J].
HOLTE, RC .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1993, 11 (01) :63-91
[9]  
John DM, 2002, FRESHWATER ALGAL FLO, V1
[10]   CPC2: a fast and accurate coding potential calculator based on sequence intrinsic features [J].
Kang, Yu-Jian ;
Yang, De-Chang ;
Kong, Lei ;
Hou, Mei ;
Meng, Yu-Qi ;
Wei, Liping ;
Gao, Ge .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (W1) :W12-W16