MR imaging of prostate after treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound

被引:87
作者
Kirkham, Alexander P. S. [1 ]
Emberton, Mark [2 ]
Hoh, Ivan M. [2 ]
Illing, Rowland O. [2 ]
Freeman, A. Alex [3 ]
Allen, Clare [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Hosp, Dept Imaging, NHS Fdn Trust, London NW1 2BU, England
[2] UCL, Inst Urol, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Histopathol, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2463062080
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of the prostate and to correlate them with clinical and histologic findings. Materials and Methods: Local ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifteen consecutive men aged 46-70 years with organ-confined prostate cancer underwent ultrasonographically guided ablation of the whole prostate. Postoperative MR images were obtained within 1 month (12 patients), at 1-3 months (five patients), and in all patients at 6 months. Prostate volume was measured on T2-weighted images, and enhancing tissue was measured on dynamic images after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was measured at regular intervals, and transrectal biopsy was performed in each patient at 6 months after treatment. Results: Initial post-HIFU images showed a central nonenhancing area, surrounded by an enhancing rim. All 6 months, the prostate was small (median volume reduction, 61 %) and was of predominantly low signal intensity oil T2-weighted images. The volume of prostate enhancing oil the initial posttreatment image correlated well with serum PSA level nadir (Spearman r = 0.90, P <.001) and with volume at 6 months (Pearson r = 0.80, P =.001). The three patients with the highest volume of enhancing prostate at the initial posttreatment acquisition had persistent cancer at. 6-month biopsy. Conclusion: MR imaging results of the prostate show a consistent, sequence or changes after, treatment, with HIFU and call provide information to the operator about completeness or treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 844
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   In vitro measurement of kidney size: Comparison of ultrasonography and MRI [J].
Bakker, J ;
Olree, M ;
Kaatee, R ;
de Lange, EE ;
Beek, FJA .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 24 (05) :683-688
[2]   EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL PARAMETERS ON HIGH-TEMPERATURE ULTRASOUND HYPERTHERMIA [J].
BILLARD, BE ;
HYNYNEN, K ;
ROEMER, RB .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (04) :409-420
[3]   High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience [J].
Blana, A ;
Walter, B ;
Rogenhofer, S ;
Wieland, WF .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (02) :297-300
[4]  
Boni RAH, 1997, RADIOLOGY, V202, P232
[5]   The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection [J].
Christian Chaussy ;
Stefan Thüroff .
Current Urology Reports, 2003, 4 (3) :248-252
[6]   EFFECT OF BLOOD PERFUSION ON THE ABLATION OF LIVER PARENCHYMA WITH HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND [J].
CHEN, L ;
TERHAAR, G ;
HILL, CR ;
DWORKIN, M ;
CARNOCHAN, P ;
YOUNG, H ;
BENSTED, JPM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (11) :1661-1673
[7]   Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up [J].
Dromain, C ;
de Baere, T ;
Elias, D ;
Kuoch, V ;
Ducreux, M ;
Boige, V ;
Petrow, P ;
Roche, A ;
Sigal, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) :255-262
[8]  
Fleiss J.L., 1986, The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments
[9]   Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound:: Minimally invasive therapy of localized prostate cancer [J].
Gelet, A ;
Chapelon, JY ;
Bouvier, R ;
Rouvière, O ;
Lasne, Y ;
Lyonnet, D ;
Dubernard, JM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (06) :519-528
[10]   Transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer:: Factors influencing the outcome [J].
Gelet, A ;
Chapelon, JY ;
Bouvier, R ;
Rouvière, O ;
Lyonnet, D ;
Dubernard, JM .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (02) :124-129