Jayson!Blair, The New York Times, and paradigm repair

被引:36
作者
Hindman, EB [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Edward R Murrow Sch Commun, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02669.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This case study focuses on The New York Times's reaction to the Jayson Blair plagiarism/fabrication scandal by examining how the Times explained Blair's failures to uphold standards of newsgathering and its own failure of the editing process. The study uses image restoration and paradigm repair theories to explore how the Times attempted to repair its own image and that of journalism generally, and concludes that the Times demonstrated a more nuanced concept of paradigm repair than earlier research had shown. Although it distanced itself from Blair and emphasized the value of journalistic standards, the Times accepted responsibility for violations of those standards and admitted that the very structure of the news paradigm failed in this case.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 241
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Altheide D.L., 1996, Qualitative media analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], WOMENS STUDIES COMMU
[3]  
BANDLER J, 2001, WALL STREET J 0712, pA1
[4]   ALL THE NEWS THATS FIT TO CORRECT - CORRECTIONS IN THE TIMES AND THE POST [J].
BARKIN, SM ;
LEVY, MR .
JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1983, 60 (02) :218-225
[5]  
BARRY D, 2003, NY TIMES 0511, pA1
[6]  
BENNETT WL, 1985, J COMMUN, V35, P50
[7]  
Benoit W.L., 1995, ACCOUNTS EXCUSES APO
[8]  
Benoit W.L., 1994, Commun. Q., V42, P416
[9]  
Berkowitz Dan., 2000, JOURNALISM, V1, P125, DOI DOI 10.1177/146488490000100203
[10]  
Brinson S., 1996, COMMUN Q, V44, P29, DOI [10.1080/01463379609369998, DOI 10.1080/01463379609369998]