Perioperative Closure-related Complication Rates and Cost Analysis of Barbed Suture for Closure in TKA

被引:60
作者
Gililland, Jeremy M. [1 ]
Anderson, Lucas A. [1 ]
Sun, Grant [1 ]
Erickson, Jill A. [1 ]
Peters, Christopher L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11999-011-2104-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The use of barbed suture for surgical closure has been associated with lower operative times, equivalent wound complication rate, and comparable cosmesis scores in the plastic surgery literature. Similar studies would help determine whether this technology is associated with low complication rates and reduced operating times for orthopaedic closures. Questions/purposes We compared a running barbed suture with an interrupted standard suture technique for layered closure in primary TKA to determine if the barbed suture would be associated with (1) shorter estimated closure times; (2) lower cost; and (3) similar closure-related perioperative complication rates. Methods We retrospectively compared two-layered closure techniques in primary TKA with either barbed or knotted sutures. The barbed group consisted of 104 primary TKAs closed with running barbed suture. The standard group consisted of 87 primary TKAs closed with interrupted suture. Cost analysis was based on cost of suture and operating room time. Clinical records were assessed for closure-related complications within the 6-week perioperative period. Results Average estimated closure time was 2.3 minutes shorter with the use of barbed suture. The total closure cost was similar between the groups. The closure-related perioperative complication rates were similar between the groups. Conclusions Barbed suture is associated with a slightly shorter estimated closure time, although this small difference is of questionable clinical importance. With similar overall cost and no difference in perioperative complications in primary TKA, this closure methodology has led to more widespread use at our institution.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 129
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Mowat, Fionna ;
Halpern, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :780-785
[2]   Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement: National Projections from 2010 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Zhao, Ke ;
Kelly, Michael ;
Bozic, Kevin J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (10) :2606-2612
[3]   Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture [J].
Murtha, Amy P. ;
Kaplan, Andrew L. ;
Paglia, Michael J. ;
Mills, Benjie B. ;
Feldstein, Michael L. ;
Ruff, Gregory L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (06) :1769-1780
[4]   Barbed Suture Tenorrhaphy: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Analysis [J].
Parikh, Pranay M. ;
Davison, Steven P. ;
Higgins, James P. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (05) :1551-1558
[5]  
Sharan DA, 2007, J AM ACAD ORTHOP SUR, V15, P76
[6]  
Trocchia Aron M, 2009, Orthopedics, V32, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20090818-12
[7]  
Vakil JJ, 2010, J ARTHROPLASTY
[8]   Abdominoplasty With Progressive Tension Closure Using A Barbed Suture Technique [J].
Warner, Jeremy P. ;
Gutowski, Karol A. .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2009, 29 (03) :221-225