The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures

被引:439
作者
Shor, Boris [1 ]
McCarty, Nolan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Harris Sch Publ Policy Studies, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PARTY; STATE; POLARIZATION; PREFERENCES; GOVERNMENT; EXTREMISM; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1017/S0003055411000153
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The development and elaboration of the spatial theory of voting has contributed greatly to the study of legislative decision making and elections. Statistical models that estimate the spatial locations of individual decision-makers have made a key contribution to this success. Spatial models have been estimated for the U.S. Congress, the Supreme Court, U.S. presidents, a large number of non-U.S. legislatures, and supranational organizations. yet one potentially fruitful laboratory for testing spatial theories, the individual U.S. states, has remained relatively unexploited, for two reasons. First, state legislative roll call data have not yet been systematically collected for all states over time. Second, because ideal point models are based on latent scales, comparisons of ideal points across states or even between chambers within a state are difficult. This article reports substantial progress on both fronts. First, we have obtained the roll call voting data for all state legislatures from the mid-1990s onward. Second, we exploit a recurring survey of state legislative candidates to allow comparisons across time, chambers, and states as well as with the U.S. Congress. The resulting mapping of America's state legislatures has great potential to address numerous questions not only about state politics and policymaking, but also about legislative politics in general.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 551
页数:22
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Abadie A., 2001, STATA J, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/1536867X0400400307
[2]  
Abadie A., 2002, SIMPLE BIAS CORRECTE
[3]   Conditional party government in the states [J].
Aldrich, JH ;
Battista, JSC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 46 (01) :164-172
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Working Paper 330
[5]   Candidate positioning in US house elections [J].
Ansolabehere, S ;
Snyder, JM ;
Stewart, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 45 (01) :136-159
[6]   The effects of party and preferences on congressional roll-call voting [J].
Ansolabehere, S ;
Snyder, JM ;
Stewart, C .
LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2001, 26 (04) :533-572
[7]   Practical issues in implementing and understanding Bayesiain ideal point estimation [J].
Bafumi, J ;
Gelman, A ;
Park, DK ;
Kaplan, N .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2005, 13 (02) :171-187
[8]   Comparing presidents, senators, and justices: Interinstitutional preference estimation [J].
Bailey, M ;
Chang, KH .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2001, 17 (02) :477-506
[9]  
Bailey MA, 2005, AM J POLIT SCI, V49, P72, DOI 10.2307/3647714
[10]   Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-93 [J].
Berry, WD ;
Ringquist, EJ ;
Fording, RC ;
Hanson, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 42 (01) :327-348