Assessment of the potential of different floating solar technologies - Overview and analysis of different case studies

被引:176
作者
Oliveira-Pinto, Sara [1 ]
Stokkermans, Jasper [1 ]
机构
[1] Equinor ASA, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Floating solar PV; Heat loss factor; Cooling effect; PVsyst (R); Renewable energy sources; WAVE ENERGY; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS; PV MODULES; TILT ANGLE; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; IMPACT; RADIATION; LOSSES; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112747
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Floating solar technology (FPV) emergence is driven by lack of available land, loss of efficiency at high operating cell temperature, energy security and decarbonization targets. It is a promising area of solar photovoltaic application, with a large global market potential. A significant challenge when assessing FPV projects is the lack of a suitable simulation tools for estimating the electricity production. A clear understanding and quantification of the cooling effect, how it differs between different FPV technologies, is still unclear among the industry. As the sector grows, larger projects will emerge, which require financing. Ensuring bankability is fundamental, thus having confidence in the energy estimates is key. Using PVsyst (R) to estimate electricity production of FV plants ensures bankability but has limitations. This work aimed to close the gap between the expected enhanced performance highlighted in the literature for FPV systems and the results from numerical simulations of energy production performed with PVsyst (R). Results show that the increase in production from FPV technologies is below the anticipated values of the literature (ca. 10%), ranging from 0.31% to 2.59%, depending on the floating solar technology. Based on the results presented, higher performance is strongly dependent on technology and the location. The values of the levelized cost of energy ranged between 96.2 (sic)/MWh to 50.3 (sic)/MWh, depending on the technology and the solar irradiation that reaches the site.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Energetic, economic and environmental (3E) analyses and LCOE estimation of three technologies of PV grid-connected systems under different climates [J].
Allouhi, A. ;
Saadani, R. ;
Buker, M. S. ;
Kousksou, T. ;
Jamil, A. ;
Rahmoune, M. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 178 :25-36
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Renewables 2019 Global Status Report
[3]  
[Anonymous], LAZ LEV COST EN AN V
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Technical report
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IEO INT EN OUTL
[6]   The economics of wave energy: A review [J].
Astariz, S. ;
Iglesias, G. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 45 :397-408
[7]  
Azami S, 2017, THEORETICAL ANAL RES, P211
[8]   Analysis of the impact of dust, tilt angle and orientation on performance of PV Plants [J].
Babatunde, A. A. ;
Abbasoglu, S. ;
Senol, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 90 :1017-1026
[9]  
Bachner G, 2017, D4 2 EC COSTS BEN RE
[10]  
BEETZ B., 2018, AFRICA ANNOUNCES UTI