Assessment of the potential of different floating solar technologies - Overview and analysis of different case studies

被引:161
|
作者
Oliveira-Pinto, Sara [1 ]
Stokkermans, Jasper [1 ]
机构
[1] Equinor ASA, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Floating solar PV; Heat loss factor; Cooling effect; PVsyst (R); Renewable energy sources; WAVE ENERGY; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS; PV MODULES; TILT ANGLE; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; IMPACT; RADIATION; LOSSES; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112747
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Floating solar technology (FPV) emergence is driven by lack of available land, loss of efficiency at high operating cell temperature, energy security and decarbonization targets. It is a promising area of solar photovoltaic application, with a large global market potential. A significant challenge when assessing FPV projects is the lack of a suitable simulation tools for estimating the electricity production. A clear understanding and quantification of the cooling effect, how it differs between different FPV technologies, is still unclear among the industry. As the sector grows, larger projects will emerge, which require financing. Ensuring bankability is fundamental, thus having confidence in the energy estimates is key. Using PVsyst (R) to estimate electricity production of FV plants ensures bankability but has limitations. This work aimed to close the gap between the expected enhanced performance highlighted in the literature for FPV systems and the results from numerical simulations of energy production performed with PVsyst (R). Results show that the increase in production from FPV technologies is below the anticipated values of the literature (ca. 10%), ranging from 0.31% to 2.59%, depending on the floating solar technology. Based on the results presented, higher performance is strongly dependent on technology and the location. The values of the levelized cost of energy ranged between 96.2 (sic)/MWh to 50.3 (sic)/MWh, depending on the technology and the solar irradiation that reaches the site.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marine floating solar plants: an overview of potential, challenges and feasibility
    Oliveira-Pinto, Sara
    Stokkermans, Jasper
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2020, 173 (04) : 120 - 135
  • [2] Criticality assessment with Pareto diagram of the different solar batteries technologies
    Imen, Azzouz
    Ines, Hammami
    Kais, Brik
    Faouzi, Ben Ammar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 17TH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, SIGNALS & DEVICES (SSD 2020), 2020, : 513 - 518
  • [3] Comparative Analysis of Four Different Solar Photovoltaic Technologies
    Kumar, Nitin
    Chandel, S. S.
    Yadav, Priya
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT (ICEEE), 2015,
  • [4] Assessment of floating solar photovoltaic potential in India's existing hydropower reservoirs
    Mamatha, G.
    Kulkarni, P. S.
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 69 : 64 - 76
  • [5] Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions
    Sharma, Vikrant
    Kumar, Arun
    Sastry, O. S.
    Chandel, S. S.
    ENERGY, 2013, 58 : 511 - 518
  • [6] Overview on Different Types of Solar Cells: An Update
    Soonmin, Ho
    Hardani, Pronoy
    Nandi, Pronoy
    Mwankemwa, Benard Samwel
    Malevu, Thembinkosi Donald
    Malik, Muhammad Imran
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [7] Performance assessment of different photovoltaic module technologies in floating photovoltaic power plants under waters environment
    Ma, Chao
    Wu, Runze
    Liu, Zhao
    Li, Xinyang
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 222
  • [8] Comparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integration
    Rovira, Antonio
    Sanchez, Consuelo
    Valdes, Manuel
    Abbas, Ruben
    Barbero, Ruben
    Jose Montes, Maria
    Munoz, Marta
    Munoz-Anton, Javier
    Ortega, Guillermo
    Varela, Fernando
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (05)
  • [9] Sun Tracker Performance Analysis for Different Solar Module Technologies in an Alpine Environment
    Ingenhoven, Philip
    Belluardo, Giorgio
    Moser, David
    Sparber, Wolfram
    JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (03):
  • [10] Design analysis factors and specifications of solar dish technologies for different systems and applications
    Hafez, A. Z.
    Soliman, Ahmed
    El-Metwally, K. A.
    Ismail, I. M.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 1019 - 1036