Development policies and tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatan peninsula: Centralized and decentralized approaches

被引:27
作者
Klepeis, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Colgate Univ, Dept Geog, Hamilton, NY 13346 USA
关键词
tropical deforestation; environmental policy; sustainable development; decentralization; land use; environmental history; Mexico; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; REGION; ENVIRONMENT; RESOURCES; REGIMES; HISTORY; CARBON; MEXICO;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.583
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is well established that for multiple biophysical contexts there are legacies of past government policies in present land conditions. Despite this recognition, however, investigation of ongoing tropical deforestation dynamics often de-emphasizes the past. The case of the southern Yucatan peninsula demonstrates the need for historical analysis in identifying key drivers of deforestation. The most important land-use changes in the region over the past 100 years are connected to shifts in national development policies. These shifts represent tensions between centralized and decentralized approaches to land management-as represented by the policies of Presidents Diaz (1876-1910) and Cardenas (1934-40)-that persisted throughout the 20th century. The legacies of these reoccurring development strategies include depleted hardwood reserves, large areas of permanently cleared forest, a complicated system of land allocation, and long-standing tensions between economic, social welfare, and environmental conservation goals. These findings suggest that while centralized and decentralized approaches to development both focus on natural resource exploitation, the rates of deforestation tend to be faster, the patterns of forest clearing more pronounced, and land-use decision making less democratic under systems of centralized control. These conclusions hold implications for land-use decision making today. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 561
页数:21
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests [J].
Achard, F ;
Eva, HD ;
Stibig, HJ ;
Mayaux, P ;
Gallego, J ;
Richards, T ;
Malingreau, JP .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) :999-1002
[2]  
ACHARD FEH, 1998, 4 SPAC APPL I JOINT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, LIBERATION ECOLOGIES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, DEFORESTATION LAND U
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, COMMON FUTURE
[6]  
Batterbury SPJ, 1999, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V10, P279, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199907/08)10:4<279::AID-LDR364>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-Z
[8]  
BRAY DB, 2000, 8 BIENN C INT ASS ST
[9]  
Brockett CD, 2002, LAT AM RES REV, V37, P7
[10]   THE LIMITS OF EXTRACTIVISM - TROPICAL FOREST STRATEGIES BEYOND EXTRACTIVE RESERVES [J].
BROWDER, JO .
BIOSCIENCE, 1992, 42 (03) :174-183