Unpacking cesarean in rural Bangladesh: Who, what, when, and where

被引:1
作者
Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur [1 ,2 ]
Perkins, Janet [2 ]
Hossain, Aniqa Tasnim [1 ]
Banik, Goutom [3 ]
Jabeen, Sabrina [1 ]
Wall, Steve [3 ]
El Arifeen, Shams [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Diarrhoeal Dis Res, 68 Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Save Children, Saving Newborn Lives, Dhaka, Bangladesh
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2022年 / 49卷 / 04期
关键词
cesarean; facility birth; maternal health; NORTHERN REGION; VAGINAL BIRTH; RISK-FACTORS; SECTION; DELIVERY; CARE; COMPLICATIONS; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTIONS; MIDWIFE;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12636
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Bangladesh has experienced an alarming increase in birth through cesarean over the last decade. In this article, we examine rural Bangladeshi women's reporting of why they underwent cesarean, who proposed the cesarean, and when in the process, the decision for a surgical birth was made. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional household survey of 2299 women in Kushtia district. Of these, 1233 who gave birth through cesarean completed a supplemental questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to report cesarean rates, which were disaggregated by sociodemographic characteristics and by antenatal care contacts with health services. We analyzed women's reported reasons for having a cesarean, when the decision was taken, and who proposed the intervention. Findings Over half (54%) of women gave birth through cesarean. The proportion of cesareans was significantly higher among women with higher educational attainment, higher socioeconomic status, and increased antenatal care during pregnancy, particularly if this care was sought in private facilities (P < .05). Women reported that health service providers primarily proposed the cesarean (73%), followed by family members (21%) and finally, the birthing person themselves (6%). With respect to the reasons for cesarean, 34% of women reported nonmedical reasons (convenience and avoidance of labor pain), and 44% mentioned only medical reasons. Over half of the women reported that the decision to undergo a cesarean was made on the day of birth. Conclusions Women in rural Bangladesh often report avoidable reasons for cesarean. Better regulation of cesarean services in both public and private health services, as well as improved counseling of women with respect to cesarean indications and their consequences, is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 718
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning from a diabetes mHealth intervention in rural Bangladesh: what worked, what did not and what next?
    Morrison, Joanna
    Akter, Kohenour
    Jennings, Hannah
    Ahmed, Naveed
    Kumer Shaha, Sanjit
    Kuddus, Abdul
    Nahar, Tasmin
    King, Carina
    Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan
    Khan, A. K. Azad
    Costello, Anthony
    Azad, Kishwar
    Fottrell, Edward
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 17 (07) : 1299 - 1313
  • [22] Tracheostomy in special groups of critically ill patients: Who, when, and where
    Longworth, Aisling
    Veitch, David
    Gudibande, Sandeep
    Whitehouse, Tony
    Snelson, Catherine
    Veenith, Tonny
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 20 (05) : 280 - 284
  • [23] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hardware Failure in Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Who, What, When, Where, and Why?
    Choi, Jeff
    Kaghazchi, Aydin
    Sun, Beatrice
    Woodward, Amanda
    Forrester, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 268 : 190 - 198
  • [24] Investigating the experiences, thoughts, and feelings underlying and influencing prehabilitation among cancer patients: a qualitative perspective on the what, when, where, who, and why
    Beck, Anne
    Thaysen, Henriette Vind
    Soegaard, Charlotte Hasselholt
    Blaakaer, Jan
    Seibaek, Lene
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (02) : 202 - 209
  • [25] Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction
    Nabatchi, Tina
    Sancino, Alessandro
    Sicilia, Mariafrancesca
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2017, 77 (05) : 766 - 776
  • [26] Canceled Total Joint Arthroplasty: Who, What, When, and Why?
    Krueger, Chad A.
    Kozaily, Elie
    Gouda, Zane
    Chisari, Emanuele
    Courtney, P. Maxwell
    Austin, Matthew S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (03) : 857 - 862
  • [27] Qualified, skilled or trained delivery care provider: a conundrum of who, where and when
    Ghosh, Rakesh
    Kayentao, Kassoum
    Beckerman, Jessica
    Traore, Brehima
    Rozenshteyn, Sasha
    Johnson, Ari
    Treleaven, Emily
    Liu, Jenny X.
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2024, 9 (09):
  • [28] Acute transfusion practice during trauma resuscitation: Who, when, where and why?
    Sisak, Krisztian
    Manolis, Michael
    Hardy, Benjamin M.
    Enninghorst, Natalie
    Bendinelli, Cino
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2013, 44 (05): : 581 - 586
  • [29] Primary antifungal prophylaxis in oncohematological patients: who, when, and with what?
    Herrera, Fabian
    Salgueira, Claudia
    Costantini, Patricia
    Jordan, Rosana
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2021, 81 (03) : 438 - 451
  • [30] Who, What, Where, When, and How? A Typology of Drought Decision-Making on Public and Tribal Lands in the North-Central United States
    Beeton, Tyler A.
    McNeeley, Shannon M.
    WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY, 2020, 12 (03) : 611 - 627