Robust parameter design based on Gaussian process with model uncertainty

被引:17
|
作者
Feng, Zebiao [1 ]
Wang, Jianjun [1 ]
Ma, Yizhong [1 ]
Tu, Yiliu [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
robust parameter design; Gaussian process; model uncertainty; outliers; hypersphere decomposition; MULTIRESPONSE SURFACE OPTIMIZATION; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION-METHOD; JOINT OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2020.1740344
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In robust parameter design, it is common to use computer models to simulate the relationships between input variables and output responses. However, for the contaminated experimental data, the model uncertainty between computer models and actual physical systems will seriously impair the robustness of the optimal input settings. In this paper, we propose a new weighted robust design approach concerning the model uncertainty from outliers based on the robust Gaussian process model with a Student-t likelihood (StGP). Firstly, to reduce the impact of outliers on the output means and variances, the StGP modelling technique is adopted to estimate the relationship models for contaminated data. Secondly, the Gibbs sampling technique is employed to estimate model parameters for better mixing and convergence. Finally, an optimisation scheme integrating the quality loss function and confidence interval analysis approach is built to find the feasible optimisation solution. Meanwhile, the hypersphere decomposition method and data-driven method are applied to determine the relative weights of objective functions. Two examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The comparison results show that the proposed approach can achieve better performance than other approaches by considering the model uncertainty from outliers.
引用
收藏
页码:2772 / 2788
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust parameter design of multiple responses based on Gaussian process model
    Zhai C.
    Wang J.
    Feng Z.
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (12): : 3683 - 3693
  • [2] Bayesian modeling and robust parameter design based on multivariate Gaussian process model
    Feng Z.
    Wang J.
    Ma Y.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2020, 40 (03): : 703 - 713
  • [3] Spatio-temporal response robust parameter design based on Gaussian process model
    Zhai C.
    Wang J.
    Ma Y.
    Feng Z.
    Yang S.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2023, 43 (02): : 537 - 555
  • [4] Robust parameter design of mixed multiple responses based on a latent variable Gaussian process model
    Zhai, Cuihong
    Wang, Jianjun
    Feng, Zebiao
    Ma, Yan
    Deng, Haisong
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 55 (10) : 1760 - 1777
  • [5] Integrated parameter and tolerance design based on a multivariate Gaussian process model
    Feng, Zebiao
    Wang, Jianjun
    Ma, Yan
    Ma, Yizhong
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 53 (08) : 1349 - 1368
  • [6] An online approach for robust parameter design with incremental Gaussian process
    Zhou, Xiaojian
    Gao, Yunlong
    Jiang, Ting
    Feng, Zebiao
    QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2023, 35 (03) : 430 - 443
  • [7] A cautious approach to robust design with model parameter uncertainty
    Apley, Daniel W.
    Kim, Jeongbae
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2011, 43 (07) : 471 - 482
  • [8] Multi-response robust parameter design based on uncertainty of model response
    Feng Z.-B.
    Wang J.-J.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2019, 34 (02): : 233 - 242
  • [9] Optimal process design with model parameter uncertainty and process variability
    Rooney, WC
    Biegler, LT
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2003, 49 (02) : 438 - 449
  • [10] Robust optimization with uncertainty using a stochastic multivariate Gaussian process model
    Feng, Zebiao
    Wang, Jianjun
    Ma, Yizhong
    Zhou, Xiaojian
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 55 (11) : 1847 - 1860