Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials as biomarkers for post-operative neurological status

被引:47
作者
Holdefer, R. N. [1 ]
MacDonald, D. B. [2 ]
Skinner, S. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Neurosci, Clin Neurophysiol Sect, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
[3] Abbott NW Hosp, Intraoperat Monitoring, Dept Neurophysiol, Minneapolis, MN 55407 USA
关键词
Somatosensory evoked potentials; Motor evoked potentials; Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; Evidence-based medicine; AB Hill; Causality guidelines; Surrogate endpoint; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; DEFORMITY SURGERY; VALIDITY; ALERTS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SOCIETY; TRIALS; CORTEX; TRACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2014.11.009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
SEPs and MEPs (EPs) are often used as surrogates for postoperative clinical endpoints of muscle strength and sensory status, as these true endpoints are not available during surgery. EPs as surrogate endpoints were evaluated using a three step framework (Analytical Validation, Qualification, Utilization) recently proposed by the Institute of Medicine (USA). EP performance on Analytical Validation may surpass that of some other biomarkers used in medicine (tumor size, cardiac troponin). Qualification of EP surrogates was evaluated with guidelines for causation proposed by A. B. Hill, which supported causal links between surgical events and EP changes and revised estimates of EP diagnostic test performance for three illustrative studies. Qualification was also addressed with a 3 x 2 contingency analysis which demonstrated decreased deficit proportions for EP declines which recovered after surgeon intervention. Utilization of EP surrogates will depend on surgical procedure and alert criteria. EPs are often used as surrogate endpoints to avoid new postoperative deficits. Although not fully validated, their continued use as surrogates during surgical procedures with the potential for significant morbidity is justified by their potential to help avoid injury and the absence of "second best options.'' (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 865
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INTRAOPERATIVE MONIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], EV BIOM SURR ENDP CH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, REV MAN REVMAN
[4]  
Aronson JK., 2008, EVIDENCE BASED MED M, P48, DOI 10.1002/9780470696323.ch4
[5]   Criteria for monitoring tests were described: validity, responsiveness, detectability of long-term change, and practicality [J].
Bell, Katy J. L. ;
Glasziou, Paul P. ;
Hayen, Andrew ;
Irwig, Les .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (02) :152-159
[6]   User's guide to the surgical literature: How to use an article about a diagnostic test [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Montori, VM ;
Swiontkowski, MF ;
Guyatt, GH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (06) :1133-1140
[7]   Will imaging biomarkers transform spinal cord injury trials? [J].
Cadotte, David W. ;
Fehlings, Michael G. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2013, 12 (09) :843-844
[8]   Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring [J].
Calancie, B ;
Harris, W ;
Broton, JG ;
Alexeeva, N ;
Green, BA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 88 (03) :457-470
[9]   Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery [J].
Dong, CCJ ;
MacDonald, DB ;
Akagami, R ;
Westerberg, B ;
AlKhani, A ;
Kanaan, I ;
Hassounah, M .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (03) :588-596
[10]   Establishing a Standard of Care for Neuromonitoring During Spinal Deformity Surgery [J].
Dormans, John P. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (25) :2180-2185