Corporate entrepreneurship level: a case study of contractors in Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Setiawan, Harijanto [1 ]
Erdogan, Bilge [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Civil Engn Dept, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
[2] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Engn Geosci Infrastruct & Soc, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REHABILITATION AND MAINTENANCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (ICRMCE 2018) | 2018年 / 195卷
关键词
INNOVATION; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1051/matecconf/201819506013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Contractors need to assess their capability to implement corporate entrepreneurship (CE), in order to develop the proper corporate strategy based on CE. This study is aimed to assess the capability level of contractors to implement CE using corporate entrepreneurship capability model (CECM). CECM has been developed based on the concept of Capability Maturity Model (CMM). The capability level of contractors to implement CE is assessed using 21 indicators which are classified into five dimensions: autonomy, competitive aggressiveness, innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking. CECM divides the capability of contractors to implement CE into four levels: initial, repeatable, managed and optimized. This study carried out a case study of 2 big contractors in Indonesia. The data was collected using a questionnaire and then an arithmetic mean of each indicator was calculated to determine the capability level of contractors to implement CE. The case study found the highest level of capability to implement CE is reached in two different indicators: innovativeness and proactiveness, meanwhile the lowest level for both contractors is risk-taking. This study also found the capability level of both contractors are at a level between managed and optimized.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Ata O., 2011, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, V24, P611
[2]   Innovation in small, project-based construction firms [J].
Barrett, Peter ;
Sexton, Martin .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 17 (04) :331-346
[3]   Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors [J].
Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje ;
van den Ende, Jan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (04) :545-561
[4]   Cooperative Innovation Projects: Capabilities and Governance Mechanisms [J].
Bosch-Sijtsema, Petra M. ;
Postma, Theo J. B. M. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (01) :58-70
[5]  
Covin J.G., 1991, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V16, P7
[6]  
DVIR D., 2006, PROJ MANAG J, V37, P36, DOI DOI 10.1177/875697280603700505
[7]   Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems [J].
Gann, DM ;
Salter, AJ .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (7-8) :955-972
[8]  
GUTH WD, 1990, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V11, P5
[9]   Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy [J].
Ireland, R. Duane ;
Covin, Jeffrey G. ;
Kuratko, Donald F. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2009, 33 (01) :19-46
[10]   Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance [J].
Lumpkin, GT ;
Dess, GG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (01) :135-172