Effects of positive psychology interventions in Arab countries: a protocol for a systematic review

被引:5
作者
Basurrah, Asma [1 ,2 ]
Lambert, Louise [3 ]
Setti, Annalisa [1 ]
Murphy, Mike [1 ]
Warren, Meg [4 ]
Shrestha, Topaz [1 ]
di Blasi, Zelda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Appl Psychol, Cork, Ireland
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Psychol, Fac Arts & Humanities, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Canadian Univ Dubai, Psychol Dept, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[4] Western Washington Univ, Dept Management, Coll Business & Econ, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
psychiatry; mental health; public health; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052477
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Despite the growing volume of published studies on the effects of positive psychology interventions (PPIs), little is known about their effectiveness outside of Western countries, particularly in Arab countries. As the effectiveness of PPIs in this region remains unclear, a systematic review focusing on this area of research can offer a valuable contribution. Here, we present a protocol for the first systematic review that aims to examine the effects of PPIs on increasing well-being, quality of life and resilience and decreasing depression, anxiety and stress for both health and clinical, child and adult populations in Arab countries. Methods and analysis This protocol is carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. A systematic literature search for studies up to 30 April 2021 will be conducted in the following electronic databases: PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Dar Al Mandumah and Al Manhal. Experimental/quasi-experimental quantitative studies evaluating the effects of PPIs on healthy and clinical participants of all ages in the 22 Arab countries will be included. Outcomes will include psychological effects of PPIs on dimensions related to well-being (eg, happiness), quality of life, resilience, depression, anxiety and stress. The risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A narrative synthesis with tables of study characteristics will be provided. A meta-analysis will be included if outcomes allow; in this instance, subgroups analysis will be conducted, depending on the data gathered, to examine differences in effect sizes based on age group, population type, duration of intervention and type of intervention. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was not required for the performance of this systematic review. We intend to publish the study in a peer-reviewed journal and share the findings at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020198092.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Al-Ghalib S., 2018, Middle East Journal of Positive Psychology, V4, P142
  • [2] Al-Wakeel S, 2010, J EDUCAT, V2, P118
  • [3] The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the general population of Saudi Arabia
    Alkhamees, Abdulmajeed A.
    Alrashed, Saleh A.
    Alzunaydi, Ali A.
    Almohimeed, Ahmed S.
    Aljohani, Moath S.
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 102
  • [4] Barrington N., 2019, MIDDLE E J POSIT PSY, V5, P60
  • [5] Basurrah A.A., 2020, MIDDLE E J POSITIVE, V6, P41
  • [6] Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Bolier, Linda
    Haverman, Merel
    Westerhof, Gerben J.
    Riper, Heleen
    Smit, Filip
    Bohlmeijer, Ernst
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [7] Effectiveness of positive psychology interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carr, Alan
    Cullen, Katie
    Keeney, Cora
    Canning, Ciaran
    Mooney, Olwyn
    Chinseallaigh, Ellen
    O'Dowd, Annie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 16 (06) : 749 - 769
  • [8] The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chakhssi, Farid
    Kraiss, Jannis T.
    Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion
    Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 18
  • [9] Hendriks T., 2018, International Journal of Wellbeing, V8, P71, DOI DOI 10.5502/IJW.V8I1.711
  • [10] How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being
    Hendriks, Tom
    Warren, Meg A.
    Schotanus-Dijkstra, Marijke
    Hassankhan, Aabidien
    Graafsma, Tobi
    Bohlmeijer, Ernst
    de Jong, Joop
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 14 (04) : 489 - 501