Usability Assessment of Steering Wheel Control Interfaces in Motorsport

被引:3
|
作者
Brown, James W. H. [1 ]
Stanton, Neville A. [1 ]
Revell, Kirsten M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
Usability; Motorsport; Steering wheel; Analysis; Assessment; MENTAL WORKLOAD;
D O I
10.1007/s42154-020-00088-z
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In order to assess the usability of steering wheel control interfaces in motorsport, it is necessary to employ a set of appropriate methods. The method selection process first involves identifying the relevant motorsport-based usability criteria. The unique factors associated with context of use in motorsport are then defined. These are employed to synthesize a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) that require specific analysis. The first KPI relates to error rates; these should be minimized, particularly under high cognitive load on the primary. The second KPI involves task times; these should be minimized not just to reduce distraction, but also to improve competitive performance. The third KPI states that usability should be optimized to minimize visual distraction. The fourth KPI advocates the minimizing of interface task load to reduce the effect on the primary task. The final KPI states that interface functionality should be easy to learn and recall. The KPIs provide clear goals to guide the identification of the most appropriate methods for each aspect of usability. Methods categories are devised and sets of appropriate methods selected based on the KPIs. These then combine into a toolset with an associated application process with the overall goal of providing a means by which motorsport interfaces may be both analysed and improved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 52
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hands-on-the-Wheel: Exploring the Design Space on the Back Side of a Steering Wheel
    Meschtscherjakov, Alexander
    Wilfinger, David
    Murer, Martin
    Osswald, Sebastian
    Tscheligi, Manfred
    AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE (AMI 2014), 2014, 8850 : 299 - 314
  • [32] On the relationship between perception of usability and subjective mental workload of web interfaces
    Longo, Luca
    Dondio, Pierpaolo
    2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY (WI-IAT), VOL 1, 2015, : 345 - 352
  • [33] Emotional Usability Test for Human Computer Interfaces
    Berg, Carlos Henrique
    Ulbricht, Vania
    REVISTA EDUCAONLINE, 2013, 7 (01): : 84 - 100
  • [34] A Usability Evaluation Process Proposal for ATM Interfaces
    Sahua, Joe
    Moquillaza, Arturo
    Paz, Freddy
    DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY: DESIGN FOR CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTS, DUXU 2021, PT III, 2021, 12781 : 553 - 562
  • [35] Usability Questionnaires to Evaluate Voice User Interfaces
    Iniguez, A. L.
    Gaytan, L. S.
    Garcia-Ruiz, M. A.
    Maciel, R.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2021, 19 (09) : 1468 - 1477
  • [36] Dual-redundancy multi-mode control of high safety reliability steering wheel system
    Mi, Junnan
    Wang, Tong
    Lian, Xiaomin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DESIGN, 2024, 94 (1-2) : 1 - 37
  • [37] Development of a Sensor System for Grasp Behavior on a Steering Wheel
    Imamura, Takashi
    Zhang, Zhong
    Miyake, Tetsuo
    bin Othman, M. D. Rizal
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 250 - 254
  • [38] Free Software User Interfaces: Usability and Aesthetics
    Laugasson, Edmund
    Mottus, Mati
    LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES, LCT 2015, 2015, 9192 : 676 - 686
  • [39] Can Steering Wheel Detect Your Driving Fatigue?
    Lu, Jianchao
    Zheng, Xi
    Tang, Lihong
    Zhang, Tianyi
    Sheng, Quan Z.
    Wang, Chen
    Jin, Jiong
    Yu, Shui
    Zhou, Wanlei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 70 (06) : 5537 - 5550
  • [40] Frequency weighting for the evaluation of steering wheel rotational vibration
    Giacomin, J
    Sbayaa, MS
    Dormegnie, E
    Richard, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2004, 33 (06) : 527 - 541