A two-stage evolutionary algorithm for variable selection in the development of RBF neural network models

被引:61
作者
Alexandridis, A
Patrinos, P
Sarimveis, H
Tsekouras, G
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Chem Engn, Athens 15780, Greece
[2] Univ Aegean, Dept Cultural Technol & Commun, Lab Multimedia Applicat, GR-81100 Mitilini, Greece
关键词
variable selection; radial basis functions; neural networks; evolutionary computation; genetic algorithms; simulated annealing;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.06.004
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In many modeling problems that are based on input-output data, information about a plethora of variables is available. In these cases, the proper selection of explanatory variables is very critical for the success of the produced model, since it eliminates noisy variables and possible correlations, reduces the size of the model and accomplishes more accurate predictions. Many variable selection procedures have been proposed in the literature, but most of them consider only linear models. In this work, we present a novel methodology for variable selection in nonlinear modeling, which combines the advantages of several artificial intelligence technologies. More specifically, the Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network architecture serves as the nonlinear modeling tool, by exploiting the simplicity of its topology and the fast fuzzy means training algorithm. The proper variables are selected in two stages using a multi-objective optimization approach: in the first stage, a specially designed genetic algorithm minimizes the prediction error over a monitoring data set, while in the second stage a simulated annealing technique aims at the reduction of the number of explanatory variables. The efficiency of the proposed method is illustrated through its application to a number of benchmark problems. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 162
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHM SE
  • [3] [Anonymous], J CHEM PHYS
  • [4] The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis
    Araújo, MCU
    Saldanha, TCB
    Galvao, RKH
    Yoneyama, T
    Chame, HC
    Visani, V
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2001, 57 (02) : 65 - 73
  • [5] Cyclic subspace regression with analysis of wavelength-selection criteria
    Bakken, GA
    Houghton, TP
    Kalivas, JH
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1999, 45 (1-2) : 225 - 239
  • [6] Nonlinear PLS modeling with fuzzy inference system
    Bang, YH
    Yoo, CK
    Lee, IB
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2002, 64 (02) : 137 - 155
  • [7] Genetic algorithm applied to the selection of principal components
    Barros, AS
    Rutledge, DN
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1998, 40 (01) : 65 - 81
  • [8] A systematic evaluation of the benefits and hazards of variable selection in latent variable regression. Part I. Search algorithm, theory and simulations
    Baumann, K
    Albert, H
    von Korff, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2002, 16 (07) : 339 - 350
  • [9] Elimination of uninformative variables for multivariate calibration
    Centner, V
    Massart, DL
    deNoord, OE
    deJong, S
    Vandeginste, BM
    Sterna, C
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 68 (21) : 3851 - 3858
  • [10] Genetic algorithms combined with discriminant analysis for key variable identification
    Chiang, LH
    Pell, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2004, 14 (02) : 143 - 155