The death of conservative Ireland? The 2018 abortion referendum

被引:35
作者
Elkink, Johan A. [1 ]
Farrell, David M. [1 ]
Marien, Sofie [2 ]
Reidy, Theresa [3 ]
Suiter, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Polit & Int Relat, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Leuven, Ctr Polit Sci Res, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Dept Govt, Cork, Ireland
[4] Dublin City Univ, Sch Commun, Dublin, Ireland
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Referendums; Voting behaviour; Abortion; Generational effects; Deliberative democracy; Ireland; VOTING-BEHAVIOR; REFLECTIONS; INFORMATION; PARTIES; VOTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102142
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The outcomes of two recent Irish referendums - on marriage equality in 2015 and abortion in 2018 - have placed contemporary Irish voters in sharp contrast with their long-standing conservative Catholic reputation. These referendums also stand out internationally because of an associated deliberative innovation. This paper aims to explain the watershed abortion vote drawing on theories of generational change, issue-voting, cue-taking and deliberative democracy, using data from an exit poll at the 2018 abortion referendum. We show that cleavage and age effects are key to understanding the referendum outcome. These results offer insight into how societal processes such as rapid secularisation, generational replacement and democratic innovations shape politics. Moreover, voters who were aware of the deliberative innovation were more likely to support the liberal referendum option. To increase willingness to deviate from the status quo, engaging citizens actively in the debate is a fruitful approach.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1957, EC THEORY VOTING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, REFERENDUMS WORLD, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57798-2_2
[3]  
Bartley Brendan., 2007, UNDERSTANDING CONT I, P1
[4]   Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Fetzer, Thiemo ;
Novy, Dennis .
ECONOMIC POLICY, 2017, 32 (92) :601-650
[5]   Reflections on the sociology of religion today [J].
Berger, PL .
SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION, 2001, 62 (04) :443-454
[6]  
Breen MJ., 2014, INT J RELIG SPIRITUA, V3, P113, DOI [10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v03i04/59267, DOI 10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/V03I04/59267]
[7]   The ideological space in Irish politics: comparing voters and parties [J].
Costello, Rory .
IRISH POLITICAL STUDIES, 2017, 32 (03) :404-431
[8]  
De Vreese CH, 2004, POLITICAL CAMPAIGNIN
[9]   Understanding the 2015 marriage referendum in Ireland: context, campaign, and conservative Ireland [J].
Elkink, Johan A. ;
Farrell, David M. ;
Reidy, Theresa ;
Suiter, Jane .
IRISH POLITICAL STUDIES, 2017, 32 (03) :361-381
[10]  
Enelow J., 1990, Advances in the spatial theory of voting