Quality of care in abortion in the era of technological and medical advancements and self-care

被引:4
作者
Shukla, Ankita [1 ]
Vazquez-Quesada, Lucia [2 ]
Vieitez, Isabel [2 ]
Acharya, Rajib [3 ]
RamaRao, Saumya [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Populat Council, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Populat Council, New Delhi, India
[4] Populat Council, New York, NY USA
关键词
Abortion; Quality of care; Telemedicine; Medical abortion; Pharmacists; Misoprostol; Abortion self-management; UNSAFE ABORTION; WOMENS PERCEPTIONS; HEALTH; MISOPROSTOL; PREGNANCY; CONSEQUENCES; PERSPECTIVES; TERMINATION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-022-01499-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Discussions around quality of abortion care have been focused mainly on service-delivery aspects inside healthcare facilities. More recently, with availability of medical abortion (MA), increase in its self-use, and emergence of other delivery platforms such as telemedicine, the responsibility of quality care has broadened to actors outside of facilities. Body of text This commentary discusses the meaning of quality of abortion care with the paradigm shift brought by medical and technological advancement in abortions, and raises questions on the role of the state in ensuring quality in abortion management-especially in settings where abortion is decriminalized, but also in countries where abortion is permitted under certain circumstances. It consolidates the experience gained thus far in the provision of safe abortion services and also serves as a forward-thinking tool to keep pace with the uptake of newer health technologies (e.g., availability of medical abortion drugs), service delivery platforms (e.g., telemedicine, online pharmacies), and abortion care providers (e.g., community based pharmacists). Conclusions This commentary provides context and rationale, and identifies areas for action that different stakeholders, including health advocates, policymakers, program managers, and women themselves, can adopt to fit into an alternative regime of abortion care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Abdi Jemilla, 2011, Afr J Reprod Health, V15, P31
[2]   Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of certified providers of medical abortion: Evidence from Bihar and Maharashtra, India [J].
Acharya, Rajib ;
Kalyanwala, Shveta .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2012, 118 :S40-S46
[3]   Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis [J].
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Starling, Jennifer E. ;
Gomperts, Rebecca ;
Scott, James G. ;
Aiken, Catherine E. .
BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 47 (04) :238-245
[4]   Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain [J].
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Guthrie, Katherine A. ;
Schellekens, Marlies ;
Trussell, James ;
Gomperts, Rebecca .
CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (02) :177-183
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EUR SCI J
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception: Executive summary
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, STATE WORLD FISHERIE, P210
[8]  
[Anonymous], WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee
[9]   The inclusion of sexual and reproductive health services within universal health care through intentional design [J].
Appleford, Gabrielle ;
RamaRao, Saumya ;
Bellows, Ben .
SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2020, 28 (02)
[10]   Pathways and consequences of unsafe abortion: A comparison among women with complications after induced and spontaneous abortions in Madhya Pradesh, India [J].
Banerjee, Sushanta K. ;
Andersen, Kathryn L. ;
Warvadekar, Janardan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2012, 118 :S113-S120